VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > CRESCENT CITIES CENTER

CRESCENT CITIES CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
CRESCENT CITIES CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City RIVERDALE   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have RIVERDALE
State attribute explanation MD   vs 1.5% Nursing Homes USA have MD
Street 4409 EAST WEST HIGHWAY  
Zip Code 20737  
Phone 3016992000  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
140  (31.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
132  (40.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
94 % (10.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 4/6/2012  
Fire Survey Date 4/10/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Corporation  vs 18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
13  (5.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
132  (40.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.68  (0.09 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.18  (0.34 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.86  (0.27 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.17  (5.32 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.17  (0.07 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 10/17/2011
date Of Correction: 11/28/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure There Is A Pest Control Program To Prevent/deal With Mice, Insects, Or Other Pests.
survey Date: 03/30/2010
date Of Correction: 05/14/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Dispose Of Garbage And Refuse Properly.
survey Date: 03/30/2010
date Of Correction: 05/14/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 03/30/2010
date Of Correction: 05/14/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.
survey Date: 03/30/2010
date Of Correction: 05/14/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 03/30/2010
date Of Correction: 05/14/2010 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.
survey Date: 03/30/2010
date Of Correction: 05/14/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 03/30/2010
date Of Correction: 05/14/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.
survey Date: 03/30/2010
date Of Correction: 05/14/2010 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 01/07/2011
date Of Correction: 02/18/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Operate And Provide Services According To Federal, State, And Local Laws And Professional Standards.
survey Date: 03/30/2010
date Of Correction: 05/14/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Post Nurse Staffing Information/data On A Daily Basis.
survey Date: 03/30/2010
date Of Correction: 05/14/2010 

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way.
survey Date: 03/30/2010
date Of Correction: 05/14/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 8.9 / 9.9 % 
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.4 % (32.55 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.20 % (14.46 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.7 % (9.88 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.1 % (10.73 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
37.1 % (7.44 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.9 % (14.73 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
75.2 % (61.74 % higher than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9.6 % (15.42 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
92.7 % (8.06 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
93.9 % (9.96 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.2 % (10.32 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 8.9 / 9.9 % 
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.3 % (23.4 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.6 % (12.5 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.6 % (5.62 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.4 % (8.1 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
34.5 % (8.88 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.7 % (8.95 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.4 % (9.18 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.9 % (6.83 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 10.3:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
86.1 % (4.66 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
90.4 % (15.65 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.7 % (13.64 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved