VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > ELIM PARK BAPTIST HOME, INC

ELIM PARK BAPTIST HOME, INC

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
ELIM PARK BAPTIST HOME, INC VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City CHESHIRE   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have CHESHIRE
State attribute explanation CT   vs 1.5% Nursing Homes USA have CT
Street 140 COOK HILL RD  
Zip Code 6410  
Phone 2032723547  
Overall Star Rating
(1.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(2.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
90  (18.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
80  (11.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
89 % (5.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 5/19/2011  
Fire Survey Date 5/16/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Church Related  vs 4.4% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Church related
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? Yes  vs 9.1% Nursing Homes USA have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 3  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
80  (11.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.69  (0.92 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.85  (0.01 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
2.54  (0.95 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.24  (5.25 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.24  (0.14 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 09/22/2009
date Of Correction: 11/17/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 09/22/2009
date Of Correction: 11/17/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.
survey Date: 09/22/2009
date Of Correction: 11/17/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
16.4 % (8.69 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.20 % (30.75 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
12.2 % (4.46 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.6 % (8.98 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6 % (5.83 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2 % (13.63 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9 % (4.46 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
8.8 % (19.58 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
44.1 % (19.08 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
86.3 % (1.66 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
88.9 % (4.96 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
5.7 % (40.2 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.9 % (12.62 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 18.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.9 % (20.8 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
13.5 % (0.6 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.6 % (5.62 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.6 % (0.9 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
47.1 % (3.72 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.7 % (9.95 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 5.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.5 % (14.36 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2 % (8.73 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
37.4 % (12.64 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
87 % (5.56 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
86.3 % (11.55 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
21.7 % (4.36 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved