VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > EMPRESS CARE CENTER, LLC

EMPRESS CARE CENTER, LLC

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
EMPRESS CARE CENTER, LLC VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City SAN JOSE   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have SAN JOSE
State attribute explanation CA   vs 7.8% Nursing Homes USA have CA
Street 1299 S. BASCOM AVENUE  
Zip Code 95128  
Phone 4082870616  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
67  (41.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
59  (32.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
88 % (4.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 5/8/2012  
Fire Survey Date 5/9/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 20  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
59  (32.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.16  (0.61 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.66  (0.18 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.82  (0.77 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04  (5.45 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04  (0.06 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 07/31/2009
date Of Correction: 09/22/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 07/31/2009
date Of Correction: 09/22/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Enough Notice Before Discharging Or Transferring A Resident.
survey Date: 03/15/2012
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Written Records When A Resident Is Transferred Or Discharged.
survey Date: 03/15/2012
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Enough Notice Before Discharging Or Transferring A Resident.
survey Date: 12/21/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Establish And Follow A Written Policy That Permits A Resident To Return To The Nursing Home After Hospitalization.
survey Date: 10/14/2009
date Of Correction: 12/30/2009 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Enough Notice Before Discharging Or Transferring A Resident.
survey Date: 10/14/2009
date Of Correction: 12/30/2009 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Enough Notice Before Discharging Or Transferring A Resident.
survey Date: 04/02/2009
date Of Correction: 04/21/2009 

Deficiency #7 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Enough Notice Before Discharging Or Transferring A Resident.
survey Date: 03/15/2012
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #8 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Written Records When A Resident Is Transferred Or Discharged.
survey Date: 03/15/2012
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #9 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Enough Notice Before Discharging Or Transferring A Resident.
survey Date: 03/15/2012
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #10 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Written Records When A Resident Is Transferred Or Discharged.
survey Date: 03/15/2012
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #11 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Enough Notice Before Discharging Or Transferring A Resident.
survey Date: 03/15/2012
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #12 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Written Records When A Resident Is Transferred Or Discharged.
survey Date: 03/15/2012
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #13 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Enough Notice Before Discharging Or Transferring A Resident.
survey Date: 03/15/2012
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #14 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Written Records When A Resident Is Transferred Or Discharged.
survey Date: 03/15/2012
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #15 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Enough Notice Before Discharging Or Transferring A Resident.
survey Date: 12/21/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #16 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Establish And Follow A Written Policy That Permits A Resident To Return To The Nursing Home After Hospitalization.
survey Date: 10/14/2009
date Of Correction: 12/30/2009 

Deficiency #17 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Enough Notice Before Discharging Or Transferring A Resident.
survey Date: 10/14/2009
date Of Correction: 12/30/2009 

Deficiency #18 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Enough Notice Before Discharging Or Transferring A Resident.
survey Date: 04/02/2009
date Of Correction: 04/21/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.7 (74.7) % (1.39 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
23.7 (74.7) % (7.04 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
75.2 % (63.37 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
51.5 % (6.96 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.9 % (13.73 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
18.5 % (5.04 % higher than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3.6 % (40.08 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
45.5 % (20.48 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
100 % (15.36 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
100 % (16.06 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.4 % (10.12 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
38 % (12.61 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
25.7 % (11.6 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.20 % (7.02 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
75.2 % (66.7 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
57 % (13.62 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.4 % (9.25 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 14.7:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.5 % (17.36 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.5 % (36.03 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.7 % (5.03 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
31.6 % (6.84 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.3 % (16.86 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
99.2 % (24.45 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
9.3 % (8.04 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved