GOLDEN LIVINGCENTER-HAGERSTOWN

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	HAGERSTOWN	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have HAGERSTOWN
State attribute explanation	MD	vs	1.5% Nursing Homes USA have MD	compare MD Nursing Homes USA
Street	750 DUAL HIGHWAY
Zip Code	21740
Phone	3017974020
Overall Star Rating	4 (0.89 higher than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (4)
Health Inspections Star Rating	4 (1.17 higher than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (4)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	2 (1.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (2)
Quality Measures Star Rating	4 (0.69 higher than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (4)
RN Only Star Rating	3 (0.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (3)
Number of Certified Beds	140 (31.06 higher than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (140)
Total Number of Residents	135 (43.75 higher than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (135)
Percent of Occupied Beds	96 % (12.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (96) %
Health Survey Date	10/7/2011
Fire Survey Date	12/28/2011
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	Both	vs	29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	Yes	vs	31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	20 (12.52 higher than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	135 (43.62 higher than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.61 (0.16 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.56 (0.28 lower than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.17 (0.42 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.05 (5.44 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.05 (0.05 lower than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Safe, Easy To Use, Clean And Comfortable For Residents, Staff And The Public. survey Date: 08/05/2009 date Of Correction: 09/20/2009
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 08/05/2009 date Of Correction: 09/20/2009

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Written Records When A Resident Is Transferred Or Discharged. survey Date: 08/11/2010 date Of Correction: 08/24/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Notify The Resident Or Provide Reasons For A Transfer Or Discharge. survey Date: 08/11/2010 date Of Correction: 08/24/2010

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 02/23/2012 date Of Correction: 03/23/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Residents With Reduced Range Of Motion Get Proper Treatment And Services To Increase Range Of Motion. survey Date: 10/07/2011 date Of Correction: 11/12/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Routine And 24-hour Emergency Dental Care For Each Resident. survey Date: 08/05/2009 date Of Correction: 09/20/2009
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 08/05/2009 date Of Correction: 09/20/2009

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 10/07/2011 date Of Correction: 11/12/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan. survey Date: 08/05/2009 date Of Correction: 09/20/2009
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 08/05/2009 date Of Correction: 09/20/2009
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity. survey Date: 08/05/2009 date Of Correction: 09/20/2009

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Operate And Provide Services According To Federal, State, And Local Laws And Professional Standards. survey Date: 10/07/2011 date Of Correction: 11/12/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Operate And Provide Services According To Federal, State, And Local Laws And Professional Standards. survey Date: 10/20/2010 date Of Correction: 11/18/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 08/05/2009 date Of Correction: 09/20/2009
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Operate And Provide Services According To Federal, State, And Local Laws And Professional Standards. survey Date: 08/05/2009 date Of Correction: 09/20/2009

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Maintain Drug Records And Properly Mark/label Drugs And Other Similar Products According To Accepted Professional Standards. survey Date: 10/07/2011 date Of Correction: 11/12/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: At Least Once A Month, Have A Licensed Pharmacist Review Each Resident's Medication(s) And Report Any Irregularities To The Attending Doctor. survey Date: 10/07/2011 date Of Correction: 11/12/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being. survey Date: 10/07/2011 date Of Correction: 11/12/2011

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way. survey Date: 08/05/2009 date Of Correction: 09/20/2009

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	12.2 % (12.89 % lower than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	1.4 % (31.55 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	13.3 % (3.36 % lower than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	2.4 % (10.18 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	5.7 % (6.13 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	41 % (3.54 % lower than average)	vs	44.54 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	4.8 % (10.83 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	5.7 % (7.76 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	13.5 % (14.88 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	0.9 % (42.78 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	26.3 (79.3) % (1.28 % higher than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	72.3 % (12.34 % lower than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	78.3 % (5.64 % lower than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	2.20 % (43.7 % lower than average)	vs	45.90 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	2.8 % (12.72 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	14.9-28 % (10.49 % lower than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	1.2 % (22.5 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	12.2 % (1.9 % lower than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	3 % (6.22 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	4.2 % (4.3 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	45.5 % (2.12 % higher than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	5.1 % (5.55 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	5.2 % (4.38 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	14.7:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	1.3 % (37.23 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	3.2 % (7.53 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	23.4 % (1.36 % lower than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	63.9 % (17.54 % lower than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	79.3 % (4.55 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	23.3 % (5.96 % higher than average)	vs	17.34 %