VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > GOLDEN LIVINGCENTER-STENTON

GOLDEN LIVINGCENTER-STENTON

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
GOLDEN LIVINGCENTER-STENTON VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City Philadelphia  vs 0.3% Nursing Homes USA have Philadelphia
State attribute explanation PA   vs 4.5% Nursing Homes USA have PA
Street 7310 STENTON AVENUE  
Zip Code 19150  
Phone 2152422727  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
94  (14.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
89  (2.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
95 % (11.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 9/20/2011  
Fire Survey Date 9/6/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Partnership  vs 7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(1.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
89  (2.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.72  (0.05 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.67  (0.17 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.39  (0.2 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.12  (5.37 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.12  (0.02 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Safe, Easy To Use, Clean And Comfortable For Residents, Staff And The Public.
survey Date: 11/17/2011
date Of Correction: 12/05/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Clean Bed And Bath Linens That Are In Good Condition.
survey Date: 11/17/2011
date Of Correction: 12/05/2011 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 06/08/2009
date Of Correction: 06/16/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 01/27/2012
date Of Correction: 03/05/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 09/27/2010
date Of Correction: 10/12/2010 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Receive Registry Verification That A Nurse Aide Has Met The Required Training And Skills That The State Requires; And 2) Ensure Nurse Aides Receive The Required Retraining After 24 Months If Nursing Related Services Were Not Provided For Monetary Compensation
survey Date: 11/17/2011
date Of Correction: 12/05/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
27.3 % (2.21 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.6 % (31.35 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.4 % (14.26 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.8 % (5.78 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.8 % (5.03 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
61.8 % (17.26 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.6 % (12.03 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.7 % (10.76 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained 2.6 / 3 % 
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 17.1:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
33.3 % (51.34 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
40.3 % (43.64 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury 2.6 / 3 % 
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
27.8 (82.0) % (2.41 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.6 % (22.1 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.1 % (10 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.4 % (0.82 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.1 % (1.4 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
62.3 % (18.92 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.1 % (5.55 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.20 % (7.38 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.9 % (18.96 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3 % (35.53 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.7 % (9.03 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
14.3 % (10.46 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine 17.3:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
36.4 % (38.35 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
14.1 % (3.24 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved