VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY - ALBERT LEA

GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY - ALBERT LEA

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY - ALBERT LEA VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City ALBERT LEA   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have ALBERT LEA
State attribute explanation MN   vs 2.4% Nursing Homes USA have MN
Street 75507 240TH STREET  
Zip Code 56007  
Phone 5073730683  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
126  (17.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
121  (29.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
96 % (12.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 8/4/2011  
Fire Survey Date 8/4/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Corporation  vs 18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? Yes  vs 9.1% Nursing Homes USA have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(6.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
121  (29.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 10/21/2010
date Of Correction: 12/13/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
11 % (14.09 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.7 % (30.25 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
18.5 % (1.84 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.5 % (10.08 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.7 % (2.13 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
49.1 % (4.56 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.2 % (11.43 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.8 % (5.66 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
11.7 % (16.68 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
19.3 % (5.72 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
89.3 % (4.66 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
88.1 % (4.16 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.1 % (43.8 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.8 % (9.72 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
11.5 % (13.89 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.5 % (21.2 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
13.8 % (0.3 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.7 % (5.52 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.3 % (0.2 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
44.4 % (1.02 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
6.1 % (4.55 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8 % (1.58 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms 11.8:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.5 % (7.23 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
27.9 % (3.14 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
87.3 % (5.86 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
86.6 % (11.85 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
9.8 % (7.54 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved