VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > KINDRED TRANSITIONAL CARE AND REHAB-WILDWOOD

KINDRED TRANSITIONAL CARE AND REHAB-WILDWOOD

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
KINDRED TRANSITIONAL CARE AND REHAB-WILDWOOD VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City INDIANAPOLIS   vs 0.3% Nursing Homes USA have INDIANAPOLIS
State attribute explanation IN   vs 3.1% Nursing Homes USA have IN
Street 7301 E 16TH ST  
Zip Code 46219  
Phone 3173531290  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
160  (51.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
142  (50.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
89 % (5.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 5/22/2012  
Fire Survey Date 6/12/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(55.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
25  (17.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
142  (50.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.61  (0.16 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.22  (0.38 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.84  (0.25 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.25  (5.24 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.25  (0.15 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 02/24/2012
date Of Correction: 03/21/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Safe, Easy To Use, Clean And Comfortable For Residents, Staff And The Public.
survey Date: 03/23/2010
date Of Correction: 06/22/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 02/24/2012
date Of Correction: 03/21/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 11/23/2010
date Of Correction: 12/23/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 11/23/2010
date Of Correction: 12/23/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 07/16/2009
date Of Correction: 08/21/2009 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 07/16/2009
date Of Correction: 08/21/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Tell The Resident Or The Resident's Representative In Writing How Long The Nursing Home Will Hold The Resident's Bed.
survey Date: 12/30/2011
date Of Correction: 01/16/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 04/21/2011
date Of Correction: 05/20/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 08/21/2009
date Of Correction: 09/24/2009 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Enough Notice Before Discharging Or Transferring A Resident.
survey Date: 07/16/2009
date Of Correction: 08/21/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give Each Resident Enough Fluids To Keep Them Healthy And Prevent Dehydration.
survey Date: 05/23/2012
date Of Correction: 06/20/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 05/23/2012
date Of Correction: 06/20/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 02/24/2012
date Of Correction: 03/21/2012 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 06/14/2011
date Of Correction: 07/08/2011 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 08/21/2009
date Of Correction: 09/24/2009 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 07/16/2009
date Of Correction: 08/21/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 02/24/2012
date Of Correction: 03/21/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 08/21/2009
date Of Correction: 09/24/2009 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Review Or Revise The Resident's Care Plan After Any Major Change In A Resident's Physical Or Mental Health.
survey Date: 08/21/2009
date Of Correction: 09/24/2009 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.
survey Date: 08/21/2009
date Of Correction: 09/24/2009 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 07/16/2009
date Of Correction: 09/24/2009 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 05/23/2012
date Of Correction: 06/20/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 03/23/2010
date Of Correction: 06/22/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 08/21/2009
date Of Correction: 09/24/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
6.5 % (18.59 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.1 % (30.85 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.1 % (14.56 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.8 % (3.78 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8 % (3.83 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
29.4 % (15.14 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.7 % (9.93 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2 % (11.46 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
9 % (19.38 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9.6 % (15.42 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
75.2 % (9.44 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
70.8 % (13.14 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2 % (13.52 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
9 % (16.39 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.20 % (21.5 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.1 % (9 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
11.3 % (2.08 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.3 % (0.2 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
27.1 % (16.28 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.1 % (5.55 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.7 % (4.88 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
10.6 % (9.26 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.3 % (9.43 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 10.1:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
69.3 % (12.14 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
65.3 % (9.45 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.50 % (15.84 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved