KINGSVILLE NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	KINGSVILLE	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have KINGSVILLE
State attribute explanation	TX	vs	7.6% Nursing Homes USA have TX	compare TX Nursing Homes USA
Street	3130 S BRAHMA BLVD
Zip Code	78363
Phone	3615928700
Overall Star Rating	1 (2.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (1)
Health Inspections Star Rating	2 (0.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (2)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	1 (2.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (1)
Quality Measures Star Rating	4 (0.69 higher than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (4)
RN Only Star Rating	1 (2.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (1)
Number of Certified Beds	120 (11.06 higher than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (120)
Total Number of Residents	116 (24.75 higher than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (116)
Percent of Occupied Beds	97 % (13.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (97) %
Health Survey Date	10/28/2011
Fire Survey Date	10/28/2011
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Partnership	vs	7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership	compare For profit - Partnership Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	16 (8.52 higher than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	116 (24.62 higher than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.43 (0.34 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.76 (0.08 lower than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.18 (0.41 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.01 (5.48 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.01 (0.09 lower than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Safe, Easy To Use, Clean And Comfortable For Residents, Staff And The Public. survey Date: 04/18/2012 date Of Correction: 04/20/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading. survey Date: 12/13/2011 date Of Correction: 01/16/2012

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 10/12/2010 date Of Correction: 11/04/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 10/12/2010 date Of Correction: 11/04/2010

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality. survey Date: 03/22/2012 date Of Correction: 03/23/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Each Resident's Personal And Medical Records Private And Confidential. survey Date: 03/22/2012 date Of Correction: 03/23/2012
Deficiency #3		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality. survey Date: 07/14/2011 date Of Correction: 08/17/2011
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality. survey Date: 04/05/2011 date Of Correction: 04/06/2011
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident. survey Date: 03/21/2011 date Of Correction: 03/22/2011

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 04/18/2012 date Of Correction: 04/19/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 07/14/2011 date Of Correction: 08/10/2011

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Nurse Aides Show They Have The Skills And Techniques To Be Able To Care For Residents' Needs. survey Date: 04/18/2012 date Of Correction: 04/19/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Nurse Aides Show They Have The Skills And Techniques To Be Able To Care For Residents' Needs. survey Date: 12/13/2011 date Of Correction: 12/16/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 1 deficiency: Post Nurse Staffing Information/data On A Daily Basis. survey Date: 04/20/2011 date Of Correction: 04/21/2011

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist. survey Date: 07/14/2011 date Of Correction: 07/14/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist. survey Date: 05/14/2009 date Of Correction: 06/05/2009

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	40.4 % (15.31 % higher than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	0.9 % (32.05 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	8.3 % (8.36 % lower than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	11.8:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	4 % (7.83 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	21.9 % (22.64 % lower than average)	vs	44.54 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	9.4 / 10.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	75.2 % (61.74 % higher than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	8 % (35.68 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	1.6 % (23.42 % lower than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	72.3 % (12.34 % lower than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	72.3 % (11.64 % lower than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	3.2 % (42.7 % lower than average)	vs	45.90 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	3 % (12.52 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	43.5 % (18.11 % higher than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	1.8 % (21.9 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	8.2 % (5.9 % lower than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	9.5 % (0.28 % higher than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	4.2 % (4.3 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	19.4:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	8.5 % (2.15 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	0.3 % (9.28 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	9.7 % (28.83 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	1.9 % (8.83 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	3.7 % (21.06 % lower than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	76.9 % (4.54 % lower than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	76 % (1.25 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	8.6:1 %