VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > LORIEN NSG & REHAB CTR BELAIR

LORIEN NSG & REHAB CTR BELAIR

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
LORIEN NSG & REHAB CTR BELAIR VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City BEL AIR   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have BEL AIR
State attribute explanation MD   vs 1.5% Nursing Homes USA have MD
Street 1909 EMORTON ROAD  
Zip Code 21015  
Phone 4108031400  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
65  (43.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
65  (26.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
100 % (16.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 11/10/2011  
Fire Survey Date 11/21/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
65  (26.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.32  (0.55 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.77  (0.07 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
2.09  (0.5 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.13  (5.36 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.13  (0.03 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 06/04/2012
date Of Correction: 07/16/2012 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 12/22/2009
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Prevent A Loss In Range Of Motion Among Residents Who Entered The Nursing Home With A Full Range Of Motion Unless It Was Unavoidable.
survey Date: 01/06/2011
date Of Correction: 02/20/2011 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 01/06/2011
date Of Correction: 02/20/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Receives An Accurate Assessment By A Qualified Health Professional.
survey Date: 01/06/2011
date Of Correction: 02/20/2011 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: At Least Once A Month, Have A Licensed Pharmacist Review Each Resident's Medication(s) And Report Any Irregularities To The Attending Doctor.
survey Date: 01/06/2011
date Of Correction: 02/20/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being.
survey Date: 01/06/2011
date Of Correction: 02/20/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 10.3:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.4 % (32.55 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.6 % (13.06 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
75.2 % (62.62 % higher than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 11.8:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
16.5 % (0.87 % higher than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 2.6 / 3 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms 8.1 / 8.8 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained 2.6 / 3 % 
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
32.6 % (7.58 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.5 % (11.86 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
99.1 % (15.16 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.20 % (43.7 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7.7 % (7.82 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 13.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.3 % (21.4 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.6 % (10.5 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3 % (6.22 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.7 % (0.2 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
48.6 % (5.22 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
11.5 % (0.85 % higher than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.5 % (1.08 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.3 % (15.56 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.6 % (36.93 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.6 % (4.13 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
32.8 % (8.04 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
93.5 % (12.06 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
92.7 % (17.95 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
24.4 % (7.06 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved