VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > LORIEN TANEYTOWN, INC

LORIEN TANEYTOWN, INC

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
LORIEN TANEYTOWN, INC VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City TANEYTOWN   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have TANEYTOWN
State attribute explanation MD   vs 1.5% Nursing Homes USA have MD
Street 100 ANTRIM BLVD  
Zip Code 21787  
Phone 4107566400  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
58  (50.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
58  (33.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
100 % (16.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 2/1/2012  
Fire Survey Date 7/11/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
12  (4.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
58  (33.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.46  (0.31 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.01  (0.17 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.47  (0.12 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.14  (5.35 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.14  (0.04 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Make Sure That A Working Call System Is Available In Each Resident's Room Or Bathroom And Bathing Area.
survey Date: 02/29/2012
date Of Correction: 03/20/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Be Designed, Built, Equipped, Or Well Kept To Protect The Health And Safety Of Residents, Workers, And The Public.
survey Date: 02/29/2012
date Of Correction: 03/20/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Dispose Of Garbage And Refuse Properly.
survey Date: 02/29/2012
date Of Correction: 03/20/2012 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.
survey Date: 02/29/2012
date Of Correction: 03/20/2012 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.
survey Date: 02/01/2012
date Of Correction: 02/29/2012 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 03/19/2010
date Of Correction: 04/15/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 06/30/2009
date Of Correction: 08/07/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 06/30/2009
date Of Correction: 08/07/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 02/01/2012
date Of Correction: 02/29/2012 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Maintain Drug Records And Properly Mark/label Drugs And Other Similar Products According To Accepted Professional Standards.
survey Date: 02/01/2012
date Of Correction: 02/29/2012 

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way.
survey Date: 02/29/2012
date Of Correction: 03/20/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way.
survey Date: 04/08/2011
date Of Correction: 04/25/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.9 (64.2) % (7.19 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.7 % (11.96 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
75.2 % (62.62 % higher than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.9 % (5.93 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.5 % (13.13 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 12.8:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.5 % (17.52 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
99.2 % (14.56 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
96.9 % (12.96 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 % (59.68 % higher than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
16.8 % (8.59 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.7 % (5.4 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.4 % (2.82 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.3 % (0.8 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
64.7 % (21.32 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
7.8 % (2.85 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
11.3 % (1.72 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.2 % (16.66 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 % (64.47 % higher than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 8.9 / 9.9 % 
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
95 % (13.56 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
93.5 % (18.75 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
21 % (3.66 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved