VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > NORTH AURORA CARE CENTER

NORTH AURORA CARE CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
NORTH AURORA CARE CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened 75.2 % 
City NORTH AURORA   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have NORTH AURORA
State attribute explanation IL   vs 5% Nursing Homes USA have IL
Street 310 BANBURY ROAD  
Zip Code 60542  
Phone 6308927627  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
129  (20.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
113  (21.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
88 % (4.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 9/30/2011  
Fire Survey Date 10/31/2011  
Sprinkler Status Partially Sprinklered  vs 8.5% Nursing Homes USA have Partially Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicaid  vs 3.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Individual  vs 3.5% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Individual
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
11  (3.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
113  (21.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.27  (0.5 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.45  (0.39 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.72  (0.87 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
75.2  (69.71 higher than average)
vs
5.49

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 06/19/2012
date Of Correction: 06/28/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 08/06/2009
date Of Correction: 08/27/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 06/19/2012
date Of Correction: 06/28/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Tell The Resident Completely About His Or Her Health Status, Care And Treatments.
survey Date: 06/16/2010
date Of Correction: 07/02/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Enough Notice Before Discharging Or Transferring A Resident.
survey Date: 01/11/2010
date Of Correction: 01/12/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 11/14/2011
date Of Correction: 12/09/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 06/16/2010
date Of Correction: 07/02/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 05/03/2010
date Of Correction: 06/02/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So.
survey Date: 01/20/2010
date Of Correction: 02/11/2010 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give The Right Treatment And Services To Residents Who Have Mental Or Psychosocial Problems Adjusting.
survey Date: 12/02/2009
date Of Correction: 12/14/2009 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 12/02/2009
date Of Correction: 12/14/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.1 % (10.56 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
75.2 % (63.37 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
10.8 % (33.74 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 % (59.57 % higher than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.9 % (11.56 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.9 % (42.78 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.9 % (13.62 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
78.9 % (53.51 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.8 % (7.3 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 12.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
75.2 % (66.7 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
9.3 % (34.08 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 % (64.55 % higher than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.8 % (6.78 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.9 % (18.96 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.9 % (37.63 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.20 % (8.53 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
85.7 % (4.26 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
88.5 % (13.75 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %



Scroll To Top

saved