VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > ORANGE VILLA NURSING AND REHABILITATION LP

ORANGE VILLA NURSING AND REHABILITATION LP

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
ORANGE VILLA NURSING AND REHABILITATION LP VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City Orange  vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have Orange
State attribute explanation TX   vs 7.6% Nursing Homes USA have TX
Street 510 N 3RD ST  
Zip Code 77630  
Phone 4098868677  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(2.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
112  (3.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
43  (48.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
38 % (45.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 5/24/2012  
Fire Survey Date 5/24/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(5.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
43  (48.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.34  (0.43 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.02  (0.18 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.37  (0.22 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.13  (5.36 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.13  (0.03 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 05/27/2009
date Of Correction: 06/12/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 05/27/2009
date Of Correction: 06/12/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
28.6 % (3.51 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.2 % (29.75 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
34.9 % (18.24 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.7 % (6.13 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder 11.8:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.7 % (7.76 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
31.6 % (3.22 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
41.4 % (16.38 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
93.3 % (8.66 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
100 % (16.06 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.3 % (10.22 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
32.1 % (6.71 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.50 % (22.2 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
26.6 (79.9) % (12.5 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.8 % (2.42 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.1 % (3.4 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
11 % (0.35 % higher than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.4 % (6.18 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
15.3 % (4.56 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.2 % (7.53 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
40 % (15.24 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
90.6 % (9.16 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
44.2 % (30.55 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 14.7:1 % 


Scroll To Top

saved