VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > PLAZA DEL RIO CARE CENTER

PLAZA DEL RIO CARE CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
PLAZA DEL RIO CARE CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City PEORIA   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have PEORIA
State attribute explanation AZ   vs 0.9% Nursing Homes USA have AZ
Street 13215 NORTH 94TH DRIVE  
Zip Code 85381  
Phone 6239337722  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
128  (19.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
116  (24.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
91 % (7.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 5/27/2011  
Fire Survey Date 6/7/2011  
Sprinkler Status Partially Sprinklered  vs 8.5% Nursing Homes USA have Partially Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? Yes  vs 9.1% Nursing Homes USA have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 8  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
105  (13.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.65  (0.12 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
(0.16 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.65  (0.06 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05  (5.44 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05  (0.05 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 05/27/2011
date Of Correction: 07/06/2011 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Properly Hold, Secure And Manage Each Resident's Personal Money Which Is Deposited With The Nursing Home.
survey Date: 05/27/2011
date Of Correction: 07/06/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 05/27/2011
date Of Correction: 07/06/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Receive Treatment/services To Not Only Continue, But Improve The Ability To Care For Themselves.
survey Date: 07/29/2009
date Of Correction: 08/21/2009 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 04/08/2009
date Of Correction: 04/24/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.
survey Date: 05/27/2011
date Of Correction: 07/06/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 09/24/2009
date Of Correction: 10/16/2009 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Doctors Orders For The Resident's Immediate Care, At The Time The Resident Was Admitted.
survey Date: 04/08/2009
date Of Correction: 04/24/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23 % (2.09 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
27.9 % (11.24 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.2 % (8.38 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9 % (2.83 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
50 % (5.46 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.1 % (13.53 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 5.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
40.5 % (15.48 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
92.6 % (7.96 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
92.2 % (8.26 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 2.6 / 3 % 
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.5 % (10.02 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
24.2 % (1.19 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.4 % (23.3 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
28.4 % (14.3 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.1 % (2.12 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.1 % (2.4 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
54.9 % (11.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.9 % (6.75 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.2 % (5.38 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.4 % (19.46 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.8 % (5.93 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
46.7 % (21.94 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
90.2 % (8.76 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
87.6 % (12.85 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 17.3:1 % 


Scroll To Top

saved