VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > REGENCY NURSING CARE RESIDENCE

REGENCY NURSING CARE RESIDENCE

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
REGENCY NURSING CARE RESIDENCE VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City SPRINGFIELD   vs 0.3% Nursing Homes USA have SPRINGFIELD
State attribute explanation IL   vs 5% Nursing Homes USA have IL
Street 2120 WEST WASHINGTON  
Zip Code 62702  
Phone 2177934880  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
95  (13.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
66  (25.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
69 % (14.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 4/20/2012  
Fire Survey Date 4/20/2012  
Sprinkler Status Partially Sprinklered  vs 8.5% Nursing Homes USA have Partially Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
66  (25.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.65  (0.12 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.23  (0.39 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.88  (0.29 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04  (5.45 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04  (0.06 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 08/04/2011
date Of Correction: 08/16/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 01/04/2011
date Of Correction: 01/21/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 11/04/2010
date Of Correction: 01/21/2011 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 06/22/2012
date Of Correction: 06/29/2012 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 06/25/2010
date Of Correction: 06/30/2010 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 06/25/2010
date Of Correction: 06/30/2010 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.
survey Date: 06/22/2012
date Of Correction: 06/29/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being.
survey Date: 11/04/2010
date Of Correction: 11/29/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
18.3 % (6.79 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 10.3:1 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.7 % (4.88 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
13 % (1.17 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
7.4 % (8.23 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.8 % (7.66 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7 % (21.38 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.4 % (42.28 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
35.7 % (10.68 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
92 % (7.36 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
82.3 % (1.64 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury 5.6:1 % 
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 17.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10.9 % (3.2 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.7 % (3.52 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
16.1 % (7.6 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
33.3 % (10.08 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
7.7 % (2.95 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.2 % (4.38 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.8 % (13.06 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.4 % (37.13 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.8 % (3.93 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
34.1 % (9.34 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
89.2 % (7.76 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
84.5 % (9.75 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
24.7 % (7.36 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved