VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > ROCK ISLAND NURSING & REHB CENTER

ROCK ISLAND NURSING & REHB CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
ROCK ISLAND NURSING & REHB CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City ROCK ISLAND   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have ROCK ISLAND
State attribute explanation IL   vs 5% Nursing Homes USA have IL
Street 2545 24TH STREET  
Zip Code 61201  
Phone 3097880458  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
177  (68.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
131  (39.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
74 % (9.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 8/11/2011  
Fire Survey Date 8/16/2011  
Sprinkler Status Partially Sprinklered  vs 8.5% Nursing Homes USA have Partially Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Individual  vs 3.5% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Individual
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(55.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
14  (6.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
131  (39.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.37  (0.4 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.1  (0.26 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.47  (0.12 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.02  (5.47 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.02  (0.08 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 04/03/2009
date Of Correction: 04/15/2009 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.
survey Date: 06/10/2010
date Of Correction: 05/11/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Tell The Resident Completely About His Or Her Health Status, Care And Treatments.
survey Date: 09/10/2010
date Of Correction: 09/24/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 07/22/2010
date Of Correction: 08/11/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Send And Promptly Deliver Unopened Mail To Residents.
survey Date: 08/28/2009
date Of Correction: 09/17/2009 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident.
survey Date: 08/24/2009
date Of Correction: 09/17/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 07/26/2011
date Of Correction: 08/02/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 04/13/2011
date Of Correction: 04/18/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 03/23/2011
date Of Correction: 03/23/2011 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 12/22/2010
date Of Correction: 01/10/2011 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses.
survey Date: 09/10/2010
date Of Correction: 09/23/2010 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 07/08/2009
date Of Correction: 07/24/2009 

Deficiency #7 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 04/03/2009
date Of Correction: 04/15/2009 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.
survey Date: 09/10/2010
date Of Correction: 09/23/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
37.1 % (12.01 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
12.5 % (4.16 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
17.2 % (4.62 % higher than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
16.7 % (4.87 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
40.8 % (3.74 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.1 % (11.53 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9.6 % (3.86 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.1 % (22.28 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
38.1 % (13.08 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
87.8 % (3.16 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
90.7 % (6.76 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.7 % (13.82 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
37.6 % (12.21 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 10.7:1 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
14.9-28 % (5.68 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11 % (2.5 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
45.4 % (2.02 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.4 % (7.25 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.9 % (3.68 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7 % (12.86 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.8 % (7.93 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
41 % (16.24 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
85.3 % (3.86 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
85.8 % (11.05 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
7.8 % (9.54 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved