VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > ROCKCASTLE HEALTH & REHABILITATION CENTER

ROCKCASTLE HEALTH & REHABILITATION CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
ROCKCASTLE HEALTH & REHABILITATION CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City BRODHEAD   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have BRODHEAD
State attribute explanation KY   vs 1.8% Nursing Homes USA have KY
Street 371 WEST MAIN STREET  
Zip Code 40409  
Phone 6067588711  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
104  (4.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
95  (3.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
91 % (7.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 11/2/2011  
Fire Survey Date 11/1/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
10  (2.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
95  (3.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.87  (0.1 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.7  (0.14 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.57  (0.02 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05  (5.44 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05  (0.05 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 05/21/2010
date Of Correction: 06/17/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.
survey Date: 05/21/2010
date Of Correction: 06/17/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.
survey Date: 05/04/2011
date Of Correction: 06/15/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Each Resident Enough Fluids To Keep Them Healthy And Prevent Dehydration.
survey Date: 02/11/2010
date Of Correction: 03/16/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 02/11/2010
date Of Correction: 03/16/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 02/11/2010
date Of Correction: 03/16/2010 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 02/11/2010
date Of Correction: 03/16/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.
survey Date: 02/11/2010
date Of Correction: 03/16/2010 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Set Up An Ongoing Quality Assessment And Assurance Group To Review Quality Deficiencies Quarterly, And Develop Corrective Plans Of Action.
survey Date: 02/11/2010
date Of Correction: 03/16/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 02/11/2010
date Of Correction: 03/16/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21.6 % (3.49 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.3 % (30.65 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 10.3:1 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.8 % (9.78 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8 % (3.83 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
34.7 % (9.84 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
9.2 % (6.43 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
13.8 % (0.34 % higher than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.3 % (25.08 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.20 % (41.48 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
12.5 % (12.52 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
93.8 % (9.16 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
94.6 % (10.66 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
4.2 % (41.7 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.3 % (12.22 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
19.3 % (6.09 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.7 % (22 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
14 % (0.1 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.4 % (2.82 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.9 % (1.6 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
34.3 % (9.08 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder 9.9:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
15.4 % (5.82 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.4 % (13.46 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3 % (35.53 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.50 % (9.23 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
19.5-24 % (5.26 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
89.5 % (8.06 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
93.7 % (18.95 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
19.5-24 % (2.16 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved