VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > ROSEWOOD CARE CENTER OF ROCKFORD

ROSEWOOD CARE CENTER OF ROCKFORD

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
ROSEWOOD CARE CENTER OF ROCKFORD VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City ROCKFORD   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have ROCKFORD
State attribute explanation IL   vs 5% Nursing Homes USA have IL
Street 1660 SOUTH MULFORD  
Zip Code 61108  
Phone 8153978700  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

Number of Certified Beds
102  (6.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
62  (29.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
61 % (22.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 2/23/2012  
Fire Survey Date 2/22/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(55.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
15  (7.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
62  (29.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 03/29/2010
date Of Correction: 04/08/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 12/20/2010
date Of Correction: 01/17/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 07/28/2010
date Of Correction: 10/12/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Tell The Resident Or The Resident's Representative In Writing How Long The Nursing Home Will Hold The Resident's Bed.
survey Date: 06/10/2009
date Of Correction: 06/30/2009 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Enough Notice Before Discharging Or Transferring A Resident.
survey Date: 06/10/2009
date Of Correction: 06/30/2009 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Written Records When A Resident Is Transferred Or Discharged.
survey Date: 06/10/2009
date Of Correction: 06/30/2009 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 06/10/2009
date Of Correction: 06/30/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give Proper Treatment To Residents With Feeding Tubes To Prevent Problems (such As Aspiration Pneumonia, Diarrhea, Vomiting, Dehydration, Metabolic Abnormalities, Nasal-pharyngeal Ulcers) And Help Restore Eating Skills, If Possible.
survey Date: 09/02/2010
date Of Correction: 09/02/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 09/02/2010
date Of Correction: 09/02/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 07/28/2010
date Of Correction: 10/12/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 05/08/2009
date Of Correction: 06/08/2009 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 05/08/2009
date Of Correction: 06/08/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 12/20/2010
date Of Correction: 12/23/2010 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 09/02/2010
date Of Correction: 09/03/2010 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.
survey Date: 09/02/2010
date Of Correction: 10/28/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 10.3:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
19.7 % (3.04 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
12.5 % (0.67 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.4 % (13.23 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
10 % (3.46 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
14.6 % (13.78 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
25 % (0.02 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.3 % (10.66 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
97.4 % (13.46 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.9 % (45 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7.3 % (8.22 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.6-28 % (11.79 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.2 % (23.5 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
21.4 % (7.3 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
9.1 % (0.12 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
14.6 % (6.1 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
28 % (15.38 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.9 % (7.75 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 17.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms 5.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.5 % (4.23 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
25.2 % (0.44 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.1 % (12.66 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
96.5 % (21.75 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
30.9 % (13.56 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved