VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > SAINT JOSEPH TRANSITIONAL REHABILITATION CENTER

SAINT JOSEPH TRANSITIONAL REHABILITATION CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
SAINT JOSEPH TRANSITIONAL REHABILITATION CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City LAS VEGAS   vs 0.2% Nursing Homes USA have LAS VEGAS
State attribute explanation NV   vs 0.3% Nursing Homes USA have NV
Street 2035 W. CHARLESTON BLVD.  
Zip Code 89102  
Phone 7023867980  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(2.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
100  (8.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
70  (21.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
70 % (13.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 2/10/2012  
Fire Survey Date 2/14/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? Yes  vs 1% Nursing Homes USA have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(55.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(52.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 08/12/2011
date Of Correction: 01/20/2012 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Each Resident's Personal And Medical Records Private And Confidential.
survey Date: 08/12/2011
date Of Correction: 10/05/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 02/16/2011
date Of Correction: 04/12/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 05/03/2012
date Of Correction: 06/17/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 05/03/2012
date Of Correction: 06/17/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.
survey Date: 07/15/2010
date Of Correction: 08/06/2010 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 05/03/2012
date Of Correction: 06/17/2012 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 05/03/2012
date Of Correction: 06/17/2012 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
24.6 % (0.49 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.7 % (31.25 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
18.3 % (1.64 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
15.3 % (2.72 % higher than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.9 % (4.93 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
13.6-28 % (2.03 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9.7 % (3.76 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.7 % (40.98 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
43.1 % (18.08 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
75.8 % (8.84 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
84.5 % (0.56 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.7 % (12.82 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
25.6 (78.1) % (0.21 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.1 % (22.6 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
18.6 (65.5) % (4.5 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
11.4 % (2.18 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.1 % (3.4 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
26.7 % (16.68 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder 11.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.3 % (1.28 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.3 % (36.23 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.8 % (7.93 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
40 % (15.24 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
84.4 % (2.96 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
81.6 % (6.85 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1 % (16.34 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved