VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > SEA BREEZE HEALTH CARE

SEA BREEZE HEALTH CARE

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
SEA BREEZE HEALTH CARE VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened 75.2 % 
City PANAMA CITY   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have PANAMA CITY
State attribute explanation FL   vs 4.4% Nursing Homes USA have FL
Street 1937 JENKS AVE  
Zip Code 32401  
Phone 8507697686  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
120  (11.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
114  (22.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
95 % (11.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 6/22/2012  
Fire Survey Date 6/27/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Partnership  vs 7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 8  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
114  (22.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.41  (0.36 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.84  (equals average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.25  (0.34 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05  (5.44 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05  (0.05 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Safe, Easy To Use, Clean And Comfortable For Residents, Staff And The Public.
survey Date: 07/21/2011
date Of Correction: 08/14/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 11/12/2009
date Of Correction: 12/23/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Enough Notice Before Discharging Or Transferring A Resident.
survey Date: 09/07/2011
date Of Correction: 10/07/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Notify The Resident Or Provide Reasons For A Transfer Or Discharge.
survey Date: 09/07/2011
date Of Correction: 10/07/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.
survey Date: 05/26/2011
date Of Correction: 07/05/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.
survey Date: 11/12/2009
date Of Correction: 12/23/2009 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 06/25/2009
date Of Correction: 08/20/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.
survey Date: 11/12/2009
date Of Correction: 12/23/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
33.7 % (8.61 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.4 % (9.26 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
11.3 % (1.28 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.9 % (4.93 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
38 % (6.54 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.5 % (13.13 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.9 % (8.56 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.3 % (24.08 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3.9 % (39.78 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
38.2 % (13.18 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
92.3 % (7.66 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
96.2 % (12.26 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1 % (14.52 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
31 % (5.61 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.20 % (21.5 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.5 % (2.6 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 10.7:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6 % (2.5 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
30.8 % (12.58 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.9 % (7.75 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8 % (1.58 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
8.4 % (11.46 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2 % (36.53 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.3 % (8.43 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
30.8 % (6.04 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
89.9 % (8.46 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened 12.8:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.2 % (14.14 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved