VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > SENIOR CARE OF CROWLEY

SENIOR CARE OF CROWLEY

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
SENIOR CARE OF CROWLEY VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City CROWLEY   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have CROWLEY
State attribute explanation TX   vs 7.6% Nursing Homes USA have TX
Street 920 E FM 1187  
Zip Code 76036  
Phone 8172975600  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
120  (11.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
111  (19.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
93 % (9.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 9/29/2011  
Fire Survey Date 9/28/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(1.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
111  (19.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.27  (0.5 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.04  (0.2 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.31  (0.28 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.09  (5.4 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.09  (0.01 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 09/10/2010
date Of Correction: 09/15/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 09/10/2010
date Of Correction: 09/15/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.
survey Date: 09/18/2009
date Of Correction: 10/23/2009 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Nurse Aides Show They Have The Skills And Techniques To Be Able To Care For Residents' Needs.
survey Date: 06/17/2010
date Of Correction: 07/06/2010 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.
survey Date: 09/18/2009
date Of Correction: 10/23/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep The Rate Of Medication Errors (wrong Drug, Wrong Dose, Wrong Time) To Less Than 5%.
survey Date: 09/18/2009
date Of Correction: 10/23/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
32.2 % (7.11 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.8 % (29.15 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11 % (5.66 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.6 % (4.98 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10 % (1.83 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
51.4 % (6.86 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.9 % (11.73 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.7 % (6.76 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.2 % (25.18 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
33.3 % (8.28 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
59.6 % (25.04 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
97.1 % (13.16 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.3 % (10.22 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
29.6 % (4.21 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.4 % (21.3 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
16.2 % (2.1 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.4 % (5.82 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9 % (0.5 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
37.4 % (5.98 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.9 % (7.75 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.2 % (2.38 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.2 % (15.66 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.3 % (5.43 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
25.4 % (0.64 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
46.4 % (35.04 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
95.4 % (20.65 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
7.7 % (9.64 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved