VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE AT COLLEGE PARK

SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE AT COLLEGE PARK

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE AT COLLEGE PARK VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City FORT MYERS   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have FORT MYERS
State attribute explanation FL   vs 4.4% Nursing Homes USA have FL
Street 13755 GOLF CLUB PKWY  
Zip Code 33919  
Phone 2394822848  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(2.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
107  (1.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
64  (27.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
60 % (23.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 6/8/2012  
Fire Survey Date 6/4/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 13  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
64  (27.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.74  (0.03 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.1  (0.26 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.84  (0.25 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.1  (5.39 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.1  (equals average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 04/26/2010
date Of Correction: 05/26/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 07/01/2011
date Of Correction: 07/27/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 02/12/2010
date Of Correction: 03/11/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Help And Prepare Each Resident For A Safe And Easy Discharge And Transfer From The Nursing Home.
survey Date: 02/11/2010
date Of Correction: 03/11/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Enough Notice Before Discharging Or Transferring A Resident.
survey Date: 02/11/2010
date Of Correction: 03/11/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 07/01/2011
date Of Correction: 07/27/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 12/31/2010
date Of Correction: 01/30/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 12/31/2010
date Of Correction: 01/30/2011 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 12/31/2010
date Of Correction: 01/30/2011 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.
survey Date: 02/12/2010
date Of Correction: 03/11/2010 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.
survey Date: 02/11/2010
date Of Correction: 03/11/2010 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 12/31/2010
date Of Correction: 01/30/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 04/26/2010
date Of Correction: 05/26/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21.8 % (3.29 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.3 % (27.65 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.5 % (5.16 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.5 % (5.08 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.9 % (4.93 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 % (59.57 % higher than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
15.5 % (2.04 % higher than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
24.1 % (4.28 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
34.9 % (9.88 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
85.5 % (0.86 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
87.2 % (3.26 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
4.8 % (41.1 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.4 % (12.12 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21.8 % (3.59 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.2 % (18.5 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
15 % (0.9 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
13.3 % (4.08 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.9 % (2.6 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
53.5 % (10.12 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.7 % (8.95 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
22.7 (72.9) % (13.12 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
28 % (8.14 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.8 % (6.93 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
37.7 % (12.94 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
86.1 % (4.66 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
84 % (9.25 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
15.7 % (1.64 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved