Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare
Compare
SOUTH BOSTON MANOR | VS | All other Nursing Homes USA |
Staff Information | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Residents |
45 (46.38 lower than average)
|
vs |
91.38
|
||
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.37 (0.4 lower than average)
|
vs |
0.77
|
||
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.98 (0.14 higher than average)
|
vs |
0.84
|
||
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day |
1.35 (0.24 lower than average)
|
vs |
1.59
|
||
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.1 (5.39 lower than average)
|
vs |
5.49
|
||
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.1 (equals average)
|
vs |
0.10
|
Environmental Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Many level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep All Essential Equipment Working Safely. survey Date: 06/11/2009 date Of Correction: 07/27/2009 |
Mistreatment Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 05/26/2010 date Of Correction: Not Available |
Resident Rights Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Help And Prepare Each Resident For A Safe And Easy Discharge And Transfer From The Nursing Home. survey Date: 05/26/2010 date Of Correction: Not Available |
Quality Care Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life. survey Date: 05/26/2010 date Of Correction: Not Available |
Resident Assessment Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Proper Discharge Planning And Communication, Of The Resident's Health Status And Summary Of The Resident's Stay. survey Date: 05/26/2010 date Of Correction: Not Available |
||||
Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 05/26/2010 date Of Correction: Not Available |
||||
Deficiency #3 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Doctors Visit Residents Regularly, As Required. survey Date: 06/11/2009 date Of Correction: 07/27/2009 |
||||
Deficiency #4 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Receives An Accurate Assessment By A Qualified Health Professional. survey Date: 06/11/2009 date Of Correction: 07/27/2009 |
Administration Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Or Get X-rays Or Tests Only When They Are Ordered By The Attending Physician. survey Date: 05/26/2010 date Of Correction: Not Available |
||||
Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Medically Necessary Lab Services/tests Are Ordered By The Attending Physician. survey Date: 05/26/2010 date Of Correction: Not Available |
||||
Deficiency #3 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Or Get Quality Lab Services/tests In A Timely Manner To Meet The Needs Of Residents. survey Date: 05/26/2010 date Of Correction: Not Available |
||||
Deficiency #4 |
Scope: Many level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Operate And Provide Services According To Federal, State, And Local Laws And Professional Standards. survey Date: 05/26/2010 date Of Correction: Not Available |
Pharmacy Service Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being. survey Date: 05/26/2010 date Of Correction: Not Available |
||||
Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Maintain Drug Records And Properly Mark/label Drugs And Other Similar Products According To Accepted Professional Standards. survey Date: 06/11/2009 date Of Correction: 07/27/2009 |
Quality Measures Q1 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication |
15 % (10.09 % lower than average)
|
vs |
25.09 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased |
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
|
vs |
32.95 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers | 14.7:1 % | ||||
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight |
75.2 % (63.37 % higher than average)
|
vs |
11.83 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder |
4.9 % (10.73 % lower than average)
|
vs |
15.63 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 17.1:1 % | ||||
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms |
32.5 % (4.12 % higher than average)
|
vs |
28.38 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained |
9.5 % (34.18 % lower than average)
|
vs |
43.68 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened |
95.2 % (11.26 % higher than average)
|
vs |
83.94 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication |
75.2 (29.3 higher than average)
|
vs |
45.90
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury |
4.8 % (10.72 % lower than average)
|
vs |
15.52 %
|
Quality Measures Q3 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication |
17.2 % (8.19 % lower than average)
|
vs |
25.39 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased |
4 % (19.7 % lower than average)
|
vs |
23.70 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
7 % (7.1 % lower than average)
|
vs |
14.10 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers |
15.2 % (5.98 % higher than average)
|
vs |
9.22 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight |
75.2 % (66.7 % higher than average)
|
vs |
8.50 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder |
47.1 % (3.72 % higher than average)
|
vs |
43.38 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder |
3.9 % (6.75 % lower than average)
|
vs |
10.65 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection |
13.6-28 % (4.02 % higher than average)
|
vs |
9.58 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms |
23.5 % (3.64 % higher than average)
|
vs |
19.86 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 10.7:1 % | ||||
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury |
4.1 % (6.63 % lower than average)
|
vs |
10.73 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
31.7 % (6.94 % higher than average)
|
vs |
24.76 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine |
100 % (18.56 % higher than average)
|
vs |
81.44 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened |
90.7 % (15.95 % higher than average)
|
vs |
74.75 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication |
4 % (13.34 % lower than average)
|
vs |
17.34 %
|