VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > SPRINGS AT WATERMARK 3030 PARK, THE

SPRINGS AT WATERMARK 3030 PARK, THE

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
SPRINGS AT WATERMARK 3030 PARK, THE VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City BRIDGEPORT   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have BRIDGEPORT
State attribute explanation CT   vs 1.5% Nursing Homes USA have CT
Street 3030 PARK AVENUE  
Zip Code 6604  
Phone 2033745611  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
22  (86.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
20  (71.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
91 % (7.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 1/6/2012  
Fire Survey Date 1/6/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare  vs 5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils None  vs 3.9% Nursing Homes USA have None
Continuing Care Retirement Community? Yes  vs 9.1% Nursing Homes USA have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(54.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 18  
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury 1 % 
Staff Information
Number of Residents
20  (71.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.89  (1.12 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.72  (0.12 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day 2.6 / 3  
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.43  (5.06 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.43  (0.33 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 02/24/2010
date Of Correction: 04/05/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 02/23/2011
date Of Correction: 03/22/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 02/23/2011
date Of Correction: 03/09/2011 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 02/23/2011
date Of Correction: 03/09/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being.
survey Date: 02/23/2011
date Of Correction: 03/22/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses.
survey Date: 02/23/2011
date Of Correction: 03/22/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 02/23/2011
date Of Correction: 03/09/2011 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 02/23/2011
date Of Correction: 03/09/2011 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 02/23/2011
date Of Correction: 03/09/2011 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 10/19/2010
date Of Correction: 11/29/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.
survey Date: 02/24/2010
date Of Correction: 04/05/2010 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Set Up An Ongoing Quality Assessment And Assurance Group To Review Quality Deficiencies Quarterly, And Develop Corrective Plans Of Action.
survey Date: 02/23/2011
date Of Correction: 03/22/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Nurse Aides Show They Have The Skills And Techniques To Be Able To Care For Residents' Needs.
survey Date: 02/23/2011
date Of Correction: 03/22/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Review The Work Of Each Nurse Aide Every Year; And 2) Give Regular In-service Training Based Upon These Reviews.
survey Date: 02/23/2011
date Of Correction: 03/22/2011 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Receive Registry Verification That A Nurse Aide Has Met The Required Training And Skills That The State Requires; And 2) Ensure Nurse Aides Receive The Required Retraining After 24 Months If Nursing Related Services Were Not Provided For Monetary Compensation
survey Date: 02/23/2011
date Of Correction: 03/22/2011 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Operate And Provide Services According To Federal, State, And Local Laws And Professional Standards.
survey Date: 02/23/2011
date Of Correction: 03/22/2011 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 02/23/2011
date Of Correction: 03/09/2011 

Deficiency #7 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 10/19/2010
date Of Correction: 11/29/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
12.7 % (12.32 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
98 % (13.36 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
97.1 % (13.16 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.8 % (43.1 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.9 % (22.8 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
13.7 % (11.06 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.7 % (13.26 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
96.9 % (22.15 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.3 % (16.04 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved