STANTON NURSING AND REHABILITATION LP

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	STANTON	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have STANTON
State attribute explanation	TX	vs	7.6% Nursing Homes USA have TX	compare TX Nursing Homes USA
Street	1100 W BROADWAY
Zip Code	79782
Phone	4327562841
Overall Star Rating	1 (2.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (1)
Health Inspections Star Rating	1 (1.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (1)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	2 (1.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (2)
Quality Measures Star Rating	3 (0.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (3)
RN Only Star Rating	3 (0.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (3)
Number of Certified Beds	61 (47.94 lower than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (61)
Total Number of Residents	39 (52.25 lower than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (39)
Percent of Occupied Beds	64 % (19.65 % lower than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (64) %
Health Survey Date	8/4/2011
Fire Survey Date	8/3/2011
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	2 (56.16 lower than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	3 (53.31 lower than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	26 (18.52 higher than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	39 (52.38 lower than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.54 (0.23 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.48 (0.36 lower than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.02 (0.57 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.14 (5.35 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.14 (0.04 higher than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 01/07/2011 date Of Correction: 02/09/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 11/18/2010 date Of Correction: 12/10/2010

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 01/07/2011 date Of Correction: 03/27/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 01/07/2011 date Of Correction: 02/09/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property. survey Date: 01/07/2011 date Of Correction: 02/09/2011
Deficiency #4		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 11/18/2010 date Of Correction: 03/27/2011
Deficiency #5		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 11/18/2010 date Of Correction: 12/10/2010
Deficiency #6		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 08/09/2010 date Of Correction: 09/03/2010
Deficiency #7		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 08/09/2010 date Of Correction: 09/03/2010
Deficiency #8		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property. survey Date: 08/09/2010 date Of Correction: 09/03/2010

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Written Records When A Resident Is Transferred Or Discharged. survey Date: 02/25/2011 date Of Correction: 03/27/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Notify The Resident Or Provide Reasons For A Transfer Or Discharge. survey Date: 02/25/2011 date Of Correction: 03/27/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Written Records When A Resident Is Transferred Or Discharged. survey Date: 11/18/2010 date Of Correction: 03/27/2011
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Notify The Resident Or Provide Reasons For A Transfer Or Discharge. survey Date: 11/18/2010 date Of Correction: 03/27/2011
Deficiency #5		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 11/18/2010 date Of Correction: 12/10/2010
Deficiency #6		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 08/09/2010 date Of Correction: 09/03/2010

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 11/18/2010 date Of Correction: 12/10/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 08/09/2010 date Of Correction: 09/03/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 08/09/2010 date Of Correction: 09/03/2010

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Receives An Accurate Assessment By A Qualified Health Professional. survey Date: 01/07/2011 date Of Correction: 02/09/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Check And Assess Each Resident's Assessment At Least Every 3 Months. survey Date: 01/07/2011 date Of Correction: 02/09/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity. survey Date: 11/18/2010 date Of Correction: 12/10/2010

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 01/07/2011 date Of Correction: 02/09/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 1 deficiency: Post Nurse Staffing Information/data On A Daily Basis. survey Date: 01/07/2011 date Of Correction: 02/09/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Quickly Tell The Resident's Doctor The Results Of Lab Tests. survey Date: 11/18/2010 date Of Correction: 12/10/2010
Deficiency #4		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 11/18/2010 date Of Correction: 12/10/2010

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	29 % (3.91 % higher than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	2.8 % (9.03 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	2.7 % (12.93 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	75.2 % (61.74 % higher than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	13.3 % (15.08 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	2.7 % (12.82 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	23.7 (74.7) % (1.69 % lower than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	24.1 % (10 % higher than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	11.9 % (2.68 % higher than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	0.9 % (7.6 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	6.6 % (4.05 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	0.9 % (8.68 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	9.4 / 10.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	30.7 % (19.97 % higher than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	39.3 % (14.54 % higher than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	90.9 % (9.46 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	88.6 % (13.85 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %