VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > TAMARAC REHABILITATION AND HEALTH CENTER

TAMARAC REHABILITATION AND HEALTH CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
TAMARAC REHABILITATION AND HEALTH CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City TAMARAC   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have TAMARAC
State attribute explanation FL   vs 4.4% Nursing Homes USA have FL
Street 7901 NW 88TH AVENUE  
Zip Code 33321  
Phone 9547229330  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
120  (11.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
71  (20.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
59 % (24.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 5/18/2012  
Fire Survey Date 5/18/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 8  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
71  (20.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.61  (0.16 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.39  (0.55 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
(0.41 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.09  (5.4 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.09  (0.01 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 04/09/2009
date Of Correction: 05/13/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Try To Resolve Each Resident's Complaints Quickly.
survey Date: 04/15/2011
date Of Correction: 05/15/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses.
survey Date: 09/14/2011
date Of Correction: 10/14/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 04/18/2011
date Of Correction: 05/18/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 04/15/2011
date Of Correction: 05/15/2011 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.
survey Date: 04/18/2011
date Of Correction: 05/18/2011 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 09/14/2011
date Of Correction: 10/14/2011 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist.
survey Date: 09/14/2011
date Of Correction: 10/14/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.9 (64.2) % (7.19 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.3 % (32.65 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
75.2 % (58.54 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.1 % (8.48 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.8 % (3.03 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.50 % (14.13 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.8 % (11.66 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 8.9 / 9.9 % 
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.7 % (10.06 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
95 % (11.06 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.8 % (13.72 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
19.9 % (5.49 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.9 % (22.8 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.1 % (12 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5 % (4.22 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11.2-20 % (2.7 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
29.2 % (14.18 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.8 % (8.85 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.4 % (5.18 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.6 % (10.13 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 9.4 / 10.4 % 
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
96 % (14.56 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
96.4 % (21.65 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 11.6:1 % 


Scroll To Top

saved