VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > TEXARKANA NURSING AND HEALTHCARE CENTER LLC

TEXARKANA NURSING AND HEALTHCARE CENTER LLC

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
TEXARKANA NURSING AND HEALTHCARE CENTER LLC VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City TEXARKANA   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have TEXARKANA
State attribute explanation TX   vs 7.6% Nursing Homes USA have TX
Street 4920 ELIZABETH ST  
Zip Code 75503  
Phone 9037923812  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(2.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
106  (2.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
94  (2.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
89 % (5.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 5/9/2012  
Fire Survey Date 5/9/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Individual  vs 3.5% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Individual
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(56.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(53.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
94  (2.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.59  (0.18 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.64  (0.2 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.23  (0.36 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (5.48 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (0.09 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 10/01/2010
date Of Correction: 11/01/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 10/01/2010
date Of Correction: 11/01/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 10/01/2010
date Of Correction: 11/01/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 10/01/2010
date Of Correction: 11/01/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.
survey Date: 05/07/2009
date Of Correction: 06/02/2009 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 01/13/2010
date Of Correction: 01/14/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Ensure That All Nurse Aids Who Have Worked Less Than 4 Months Are Enrolled In Appropriate Training Or Have Been Deemed Competent To Provide Nursing And Nursing Related Services.
survey Date: 10/20/2009
date Of Correction: 11/13/2009 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Ensure That All Full-time Nurse Aids Employed For More Than 4 Months Are Fully Trained And Competent To Provide Nursing And Nursing-related Services, As Defined By Federal Requirements.
survey Date: 10/20/2009
date Of Correction: 11/13/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
57.1 % (32.01 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
26 % (9.34 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 13.9 / 15.3 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 9.9:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.3 % (10.33 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.5 % (10.96 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.4 % (25.98 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
4.8 % (38.88 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
4.5 % (79.44 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
(44.9 lower than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.2 % (14.32 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
56.7 % (31.31 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4 % (19.7 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
24.5 % (10.4 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
16 % (6.78 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.7 % (1.8 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
32.9 % (10.48 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.3 % (5.35 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.3 % (3.28 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.1 % (16.76 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained 8.1 / 8.8 % 
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.2 % (9.53 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
32.7 (90.9) % (7.94 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
75.2 % (6.24 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
3.7 % (71.05 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (57.86 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved