USSERY ROAN TEXAS STATE VETERANS HOME

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	AMARILLO	vs	0.1% Nursing Homes USA have AMARILLO
State attribute explanation	TX	vs	7.6% Nursing Homes USA have TX	compare TX Nursing Homes USA
Street	1020 TASCOSA RD
Zip Code	79124
Phone	8063228387
Overall Star Rating	1 (2.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (1)
Health Inspections Star Rating	1 (1.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (1)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	2 (1.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (2)
Quality Measures Star Rating	2 (1.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (2)
RN Only Star Rating	2 (1.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (2)
Number of Certified Beds	120 (11.06 higher than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (120)
Total Number of Residents	116 (24.75 higher than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (116)
Percent of Occupied Beds	97 % (13.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (97) %
Health Survey Date	12/9/2011
Fire Survey Date	12/8/2011
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	Government - State	vs	0.9% Nursing Homes USA have Government - State	compare Government - State Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	Both	vs	29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	1 (57.16 lower than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	1 (55.31 lower than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	18 (10.52 higher than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	116 (24.62 higher than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.38 (0.39 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.91 (0.07 higher than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.29 (0.3 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	75.2 (69.71 higher than average)	vs	5.49

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading. survey Date: 07/07/2011 date Of Correction: 08/01/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 04/14/2011 date Of Correction: 05/25/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading. survey Date: 04/27/2009 date Of Correction: 05/29/2009
Deficiency #4		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 04/27/2009 date Of Correction: 05/29/2009

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 04/14/2011 date Of Correction: 05/25/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property. survey Date: 04/14/2011 date Of Correction: 05/25/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 04/27/2009 date Of Correction: 05/29/2009
Deficiency #4		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 04/27/2009 date Of Correction: 05/29/2009
Deficiency #5		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property. survey Date: 04/27/2009 date Of Correction: 05/29/2009

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Try To Resolve Each Resident's Complaints Quickly. survey Date: 04/27/2009 date Of Correction: 05/29/2009
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 1 deficiency: Keep Each Resident's Personal And Medical Records Private And Confidential. survey Date: 04/27/2009 date Of Correction: 05/29/2009

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan. survey Date: 11/10/2009 date Of Correction: 12/31/2009
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Receives An Accurate Assessment By A Qualified Health Professional. survey Date: 11/10/2009 date Of Correction: 12/31/2009

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Employ Qualified Full-time, Part-time Or Consultant Professionals That Must Be Licensed, Certified, Or Registered Staff To Give Needed Services. survey Date: 07/07/2011 date Of Correction: 08/01/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Set Up An Ongoing Quality Assessment And Assurance Group To Review Quality Deficiencies Quarterly, And Develop Corrective Plans Of Action. survey Date: 04/27/2009 date Of Correction: 05/29/2009
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Nurse Aides Show They Have The Skills And Techniques To Be Able To Care For Residents' Needs. survey Date: 04/27/2009 date Of Correction: 05/29/2009
Deficiency #4		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 04/27/2009 date Of Correction: 05/29/2009

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 1 deficiency: 1) Provide 3 Meals At Regular Times; 2) Serve Breakfast Within 14 Hours After Dinner; Or 3) Offer A Snack At Bedtime Each Day. survey Date: 04/27/2009 date Of Correction: 05/29/2009

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	25 % (0.09 % lower than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	13.4 % (19.55 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	2.20 % (14.46 % lower than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	10.8 % (1.78 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	5.6:1 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	30.6 % (13.94 % lower than average)	vs	44.54 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	5.3 % (10.33 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	13 % (0.46 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	1 % (27.38 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	12.9 (55.2) % (12.12 % lower than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	91.7 % (7.06 % higher than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	70.3 % (13.64 % lower than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 (29.3 higher than average)	vs	45.90
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	7.3 % (8.22 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	26.5 % (1.11 % higher than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	9.2 % (14.5 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	6.4 % (7.7 % lower than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	7.6 % (1.62 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	4.9 % (3.6 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	26.5 % (16.88 % lower than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	3.2 % (7.45 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	8.6:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	1.3 % (18.56 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	7 % (3.73 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	13.5 % (11.26 % lower than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	89.4 % (7.96 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	71.4 % (3.35 % lower than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	1.50 % (15.84 % lower than average)	vs	17.34 %