VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > WESLEY PARK CENTRE

WESLEY PARK CENTRE

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
WESLEY PARK CENTRE VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City NEWTON   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have NEWTON
State attribute explanation IA   vs 2.7% Nursing Homes USA have IA
Street 500 FIRST STREET NORTH  
Zip Code 50208  
Phone 6417915000  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
66  (42.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
47  (44.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
71 % (12.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 12/23/2011  
Fire Survey Date 12/28/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Corporation  vs 18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? Yes  vs 9.1% Nursing Homes USA have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
47  (44.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.88  (0.11 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.65  (0.19 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.53  (0.06 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.11  (5.38 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.11  (0.01 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 11/09/2011
date Of Correction: 12/09/2011 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 07/20/2010
date Of Correction: 08/03/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 12/23/2011
date Of Correction: 01/27/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Use A Registered Nurse At Least 8 Hours A Day, 7 Days A Week.
survey Date: 11/09/2011
date Of Correction: 12/09/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being.
survey Date: 11/09/2011
date Of Correction: 12/09/2011 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 11/09/2011
date Of Correction: 01/27/2012 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 11/09/2011
date Of Correction: 01/27/2012 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
27.3 % (2.21 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.5 % (7.33 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.1 % (12.53 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.3 % (11.16 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.5 % (23.88 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.4 % (19.62 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.8 % (11.16 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
94.1 % (10.16 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.8 % (8.72 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
24.5 % (0.89 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.6 % (23.1 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 12.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
1.1 % (8.12 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.8 % (0.3 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
44.2 % (0.82 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.1 % (6.55 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.6 % (2.98 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.1 % (15.76 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.8 % (5.93 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.4 % (13.36 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.7 % (13.26 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
95.8 % (21.05 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
25.4 % (8.06 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved