VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > WHITEHALL HEALTHCARE CENTER OF ANN ARBOR

WHITEHALL HEALTHCARE CENTER OF ANN ARBOR

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
WHITEHALL HEALTHCARE CENTER OF ANN ARBOR VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City ANN ARBOR   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have ANN ARBOR
State attribute explanation MI   vs 2.8% Nursing Homes USA have MI
Street 3370 EAST MORGAN RD  
Zip Code 48108  
Phone 7349713230  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
102  (6.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
73  (18.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
72 % (11.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 3/30/2012  
Fire Survey Date 3/29/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Partnership  vs 7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? Yes  vs 1% Nursing Homes USA have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
11  (47.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
14  (42.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
25  (17.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
73  (18.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.73  (0.04 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.91  (0.07 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.65  (0.06 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.08  (5.41 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.08  (0.02 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 09/20/2011
date Of Correction: 10/12/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.
survey Date: 09/20/2011
date Of Correction: 10/12/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 11/08/2010
date Of Correction: 12/30/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 06/18/2010
date Of Correction: 09/16/2010 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure There Is A Pest Control Program To Prevent/deal With Mice, Insects, Or Other Pests.
survey Date: 01/05/2010
date Of Correction: 01/29/2010 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 01/05/2010
date Of Correction: 01/29/2010 

Deficiency #7 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 12/08/2009
date Of Correction: 01/15/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 09/20/2011
date Of Correction: 10/12/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.
survey Date: 07/15/2011
date Of Correction: 08/01/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 06/18/2010
date Of Correction: 07/14/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 06/18/2010
date Of Correction: 07/14/2010 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 12/08/2009
date Of Correction: 01/15/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 11/23/2011
date Of Correction: 12/12/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 04/29/2009
date Of Correction: 06/02/2009 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 04/29/2009
date Of Correction: 07/25/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 09/20/2011
date Of Correction: 10/12/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 06/18/2010
date Of Correction: 07/14/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 06/18/2010
date Of Correction: 07/14/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 01/05/2010
date Of Correction: 01/29/2010 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 12/08/2009
date Of Correction: 01/15/2010 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 12/08/2009
date Of Correction: 01/15/2010 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 06/18/2010
date Of Correction: 07/14/2010 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 09/20/2011
date Of Correction: 10/12/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Nurse Aides Show They Have The Skills And Techniques To Be Able To Care For Residents' Needs.
survey Date: 04/29/2009
date Of Correction: 06/02/2009 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist.
survey Date: 12/01/2010
date Of Correction: 12/30/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
18.6 (65.5) % (6.49 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
19.3 % (2.64 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.7 % (6.88 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.5 % (5.33 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.8 % (11.83 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
75.2 % (61.74 % higher than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.6 % (26.78 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3.2 % (40.48 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
57.6 % (27.04 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
63.6 % (20.34 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
(42.9 lower than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.8 % (10.72 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
19.8 % (5.59 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 17.3:1 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
9.3 % (0.08 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.9 % (1.6 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
39 % (4.38 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3 % (7.65 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.8 % (3.78 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1 % (18.86 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.4 % (36.13 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.3 % (5.43 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
44.4 % (19.64 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
68.4 % (13.04 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
83.2 % (8.45 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
4.8 % (12.54 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved