VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > WOODMONT HEALTH CAMPUS

WOODMONT HEALTH CAMPUS

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
WOODMONT HEALTH CAMPUS VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City BOONVILLE   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have BOONVILLE
State attribute explanation IN   vs 3.1% Nursing Homes USA have IN
Street 1325 ROCKPORT RD  
Zip Code 47601  
Phone 8128974114  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(2.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
60  (48.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
48  (43.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
80 % (3.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 5/18/2011  
Fire Survey Date 5/25/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(55.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
11  (3.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
48  (43.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.81  (0.04 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.18  (0.34 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.99  (0.4 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.02  (5.47 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.02  (0.08 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 04/15/2009
date Of Correction: 05/08/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Tell The Resident Or The Resident's Representative In Writing How Long The Nursing Home Will Hold The Resident's Bed.
survey Date: 07/14/2010
date Of Correction: 07/29/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Enough Notice Before Discharging Or Transferring A Resident.
survey Date: 07/14/2010
date Of Correction: 07/29/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Written Records When A Resident Is Transferred Or Discharged.
survey Date: 07/14/2010
date Of Correction: 07/29/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 04/15/2009
date Of Correction: 05/08/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.
survey Date: 07/14/2010
date Of Correction: 07/29/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 04/15/2009
date Of Correction: 05/08/2009 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 04/15/2009
date Of Correction: 05/08/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.
survey Date: 07/14/2010
date Of Correction: 07/29/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.
survey Date: 04/15/2009
date Of Correction: 05/08/2009 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 04/15/2009
date Of Correction: 05/08/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.3 % (11.79 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.7 % (5.88 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.5 % (7.33 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
6.4 % (9.23 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
75.2 % (61.74 % higher than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.3 % (41.38 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.7 % (13.06 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
97.7 % (13.76 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
9.1 % (6.42 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 12.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.9 % (19.8 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 15.9:1 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.7 % (3.52 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.5 % (1 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
41.7 % (1.68 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
7.2 % (3.45 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.7 % (2.88 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.5 % (36.03 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
8.3 % (2.43 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
33.3 % (8.54 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.7 % (13.26 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
97.9 % (23.15 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
19.6 % (2.26 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved