Back
 Add

Compare:

ASPIRUS ONTONAGON HOSPITAL, INC VS CHRISTIAN PARK HEALTH CARE CENTER

Overview:

There are 49 differences and 25 similarities between ASPIRUS ONTONAGON HOSPITAL, INC, CHRISTIAN PARK HEALTH CARE CENTER

General
City
Ontonagon Escanaba
State attribute explanation
Mi Mi
Street
601 Seventh Street 2415 5th Ave South
Zip Code
49,953 49,829
Phone
9,068,848,000 9,067,866,907
Overall Star Rating
3
4
Health Inspections Star Rating
2
5
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
4
1
RN Only Star Rating
4
5
Number of Certified Beds
46
99
Total Number of Residents
42
92
Percent of Occupied Beds
91 %
93 %
Health Survey Date
9/28/2011 4/28/2011
Fire Survey Date
9/29/2011 5/2/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
Non Profit - Corporation For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
Yes No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Resident Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No No
Special Focus Facility?
No No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
75.2
# of deficiencies
11
4
Staff Information
Number of Residents
42
92
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.87
1.05
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.38
0.37
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.25
1.42
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.25
0.06
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.25
0.06
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 04/24/2012date Of Correction: 06/01/2012
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 08/04/2009date Of Correction: 09/04/2009
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 08/12/2010date Of Correction: 09/30/2010 Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 04/04/2012date Of Correction: 04/13/2012
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 08/12/2010date Of Correction: 09/30/2010 Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 04/04/2012date Of Correction: 04/13/2012
Deficiency #3
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 08/04/2009date Of Correction: 09/04/2009
Deficiency #4
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 08/04/2009date Of Correction: 09/04/2009
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.survey Date: 08/04/2009date Of Correction: 09/04/2009
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 04/24/2012date Of Correction: 06/01/2012 Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses.survey Date: 05/12/2009date Of Correction: 06/03/2009
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 08/04/2009date Of Correction: 09/04/2009
Deficiency #3
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 07/21/2009date Of Correction: 08/28/2009
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Choose A Doctor To Serve As The Medical Director To Create Resident Care Policies And Coordinate Medical Care In The Facility.survey Date: 08/04/2009date Of Correction: 09/04/2009 Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.survey Date: 05/12/2009date Of Correction: 06/03/2009
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
5.7 %
13.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.7 %
4.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.1 %
15.6 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
75.2 %
5.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
18.4 %
4.8 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
36.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.1 %
10.3:1
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.9:1
10.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.8 %
2.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
33.3 %
30.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
96 %
97.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
96 %
98.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 %
6 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
10.2 %
16.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.8 %
3.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.4 %
16.5 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.4 %
7.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
13.9 / 15.3
6 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
45.5 %
32.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.7 %
14.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7 %
7.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.3 %
2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 %
6.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
26.6 (79.9)
25.6 (78.1)
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.6 %
97.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
20.2 (68.4)
96.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
7.1 %
21.4 %

saved