Back
 Add

Compare:

CARE CENTER OF LAUREL VS NESHOBA COUNTY NURSING HOME

Overview:

There are 49 differences and 20 similarities between CARE CENTER OF LAUREL, NESHOBA COUNTY NURSING HOME

General
City
Laurel Philadelphia
State attribute explanation
Ms Ms
Street
940 1001 Holland Avenue
Zip Code
39,440 39,350
Phone
6,016,498,006 6,016,631,200
Overall Star Rating
4
4
Health Inspections Star Rating
4
3
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
2
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
4
4
RN Only Star Rating
2
3
Number of Certified Beds
120
160
Total Number of Residents
112
160
Percent of Occupied Beds
93 %
100 %
Health Survey Date
6/15/2011 5/20/2011
Fire Survey Date
6/14/2011 5/20/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered Partially Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Limited Liability Company Government - County
Located Within a Hospital?
No Yes
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
No No
Resident and Family Councils
Resident Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No No
Special Focus Facility?
No No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
75.2
# of deficiencies
3
4
Staff Information
Number of Residents
112
160
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.43
0.52
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.92
1.02
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.35
1.54
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.02
75.2
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.02
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.survey Date: 01/18/2012date Of Correction: 03/01/2012
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses.survey Date: 04/08/2010date Of Correction: 05/21/2010
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Receives An Accurate Assessment By A Qualified Health Professional.survey Date: 04/08/2010date Of Correction: 05/21/2010 Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.survey Date: 12/14/2010date Of Correction: 01/27/2011
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.survey Date: 12/14/2010date Of Correction: 01/27/2011
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.survey Date: 08/19/2010date Of Correction: 09/10/2010
Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being.survey Date: 04/08/2010date Of Correction: 05/21/2010
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
22 %
36.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.7 %
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
23.7 (74.7)
12 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.2 %
2.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
14.9-28
5.5 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
26.7 %
29.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.3 %
0.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.1 %
4.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.7 %
1.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
4.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
36.8 %
20.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.5 %
92.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
100 %
83.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 %
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1 %
3.4 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20.3 %
35.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1 %
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
24.5 %
18.5 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.1 %
2.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.7 %
6.3 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
33.3 %
27.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.7 %
1.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.9 %
4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.6 %
1.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
3.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.1 %
3.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
36.8 %
23.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
95 %
91.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
97.7 %
79.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
9.2 %
14 %

saved