Back
 Add

Compare:

CARE ONE AT KING JAMES VS ARISTACARE AT CHERRY HILL

Overview:

There are 45 differences and 28 similarities between CARE ONE AT KING JAMES, ARISTACARE AT CHERRY HILL

General
City
Navesink Cherry Hill
State attribute explanation
Nj Nj
Street
1040 Highway 36 1399 Chapel Ave West
Zip Code
7,752 8,002
Phone
7,322,913,400 8,566,639,009
Overall Star Rating
3
1
Health Inspections Star Rating
2
1
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
4
1
RN Only Star Rating
4
4
Number of Certified Beds
127
120
Total Number of Residents
103
94
Percent of Occupied Beds
81 %
78 %
Health Survey Date
12/8/2011 5/18/2012
Fire Survey Date
12/8/2011 5/18/2012
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Partnership For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Resident Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No No
Special Focus Facility?
No No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
75.2
# of deficiencies
6
8
Staff Information
Number of Residents
103
94
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.94
0.86
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.07
1.17
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
2.01
2.03
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.25
0.12
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.25
0.12
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 02/03/2010date Of Correction: 03/06/2010 Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 10/02/2009date Of Correction: 10/28/2009
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 05/04/2012date Of Correction: 06/30/2012 Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 05/20/2010date Of Correction: 06/25/2010
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 02/03/2010date Of Correction: 02/07/2010
Deficiency #3
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.survey Date: 02/03/2010date Of Correction: 02/07/2010
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 1deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.survey Date: 03/24/2010date Of Correction: 04/23/2010
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 03/24/2010date Of Correction: 04/23/2010
Deficiency #2
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.survey Date: 12/11/2009date Of Correction: 01/06/2010
Deficiency #3
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 12/11/2009date Of Correction: 01/06/2010
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Set Up A Group That Is Legally Responsible For Writing And Setting Up Policies For Leading And Running The Nursing Home; Or 2) Hire A Properly Licensed Administrator.survey Date: 05/04/2012date Of Correction: 06/30/2012 Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.survey Date: 08/13/2010date Of Correction: 10/01/2010
Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep The Rate Of Medication Errors (wrong Drug, Wrong Dose, Wrong Time) To Less Than 5%.survey Date: 05/04/2012date Of Correction: 06/20/2012
Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Manylevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way.survey Date: 06/29/2011date Of Correction: 07/29/2011
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.5 %
17.9 (64.2)
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.3 %
2.20 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
75.2 %
12.2 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.5 %
8.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.6 %
24.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
8.8 %
8.9 / 9.9
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.3 %
9.9:1
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.6 %
43.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
4.8 %
9.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10.6 %
19.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
86.2 %
96.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
98.7 %
95.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.6 %
1.2 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
15.5 %
16.3:1
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.2 %
2.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.8 %
10.8 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.8 %
10.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.6:1
18.6 (65.5)
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
6.7 %
40 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
10 %
7.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.5 %
8.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.4 %
33.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
5.1 %
8.9 / 9.9
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.9 %
3 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
12 %
21.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
81.4 %
89.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
98.5 %
95.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.3 %
2.20 %

saved