Back
 Add

Compare:

CARRINGTON PLACE OF NEW ORLEANS VS RIVERVIEW CARE CENTER

Overview:

There are 49 differences and 27 similarities between CARRINGTON PLACE OF NEW ORLEANS, RIVERVIEW CARE CENTER

General
City
New Orleans Bossier City
State attribute explanation
La La
Street
5301 Tullis Drive 4820 Medical Drive
Zip Code
70,131 71,112
Phone
5,043,945,807 3,187,471,857
Overall Star Rating
3
1
Health Inspections Star Rating
3
1
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
2
2
Quality Measures Star Rating
3
1
RN Only Star Rating
2
1
Number of Certified Beds
186
151
Total Number of Residents
108
94
Percent of Occupied Beds
58 %
62 %
Health Survey Date
4/21/2011 11/3/2011
Fire Survey Date
4/18/2011 11/3/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Resident Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No No
Quality Indicator Survey?
Yes Yes
Special Focus Facility?
No No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
1
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
1
# of deficiencies
8
9
Staff Information
Number of Residents
104
94
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.36
0.3
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.94
1.09
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.3
1.4
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05
0.06
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05
0.06
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 04/04/2012date Of Correction: 04/27/2012 Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 07/19/2011date Of Correction: 08/09/2011
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 07/08/2010date Of Correction: 08/02/2010 Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Make Sure There Is A Pest Control Program To Prevent/deal With Mice, Insects, Or Other Pests.survey Date: 07/15/2009date Of Correction: 08/03/2009
Deficiency #3
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 07/15/2009date Of Correction: 08/03/2009
Deficiency #4
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.survey Date: 07/15/2009date Of Correction: 08/23/2009
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Try To Resolve Each Resident's Complaints Quickly.survey Date: 12/15/2011date Of Correction: 01/15/2012
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.survey Date: 05/20/2011date Of Correction: 06/07/2011
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 04/04/2012date Of Correction: 04/27/2012 Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 07/19/2011date Of Correction: 08/09/2011
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 12/15/2011date Of Correction: 01/15/2012
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.survey Date: 11/02/2011date Of Correction: 12/15/2011 Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.survey Date: 07/19/2011date Of Correction: 08/09/2011
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.survey Date: 07/08/2010date Of Correction: 08/02/2010
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Set Up An Ongoing Quality Assessment And Assurance Group To Review Quality Deficiencies Quarterly, And Develop Corrective Plans Of Action.survey Date: 07/19/2011date Of Correction: 08/09/2011
Deficiency #2
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 07/19/2011date Of Correction: 08/09/2011
Deficiency #3
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 07/15/2009date Of Correction: 08/03/2009
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
27.9 %
19.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
14.5 %
20 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
18.6 (65.5)
18.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
12.2 %
13.8 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
30.3 %
25 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.4 %
5.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
10.7:1
9.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 %
4.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.4 %
10.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
21.7 %
45 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
45.5 %
75.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
37.3 %
82.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 %
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.2 %
2.3 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
27.9 %
26.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
6.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
14.4 %
20.5 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
18.8 %
11.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.8 %
7.6 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
21.8 %
26.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.7 %
8.9 / 9.9
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.4 %
5.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.4 %
5.6:1
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.20 %
13.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.20 %
2.20 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
18.9 %
33.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
54.8 %
54.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
41 %
34.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 %
75.2 %

saved