Back
 Add

Compare:

COOSA VALLEY NURSING FACILITY VS KELLER LANDING CARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER

Overview:

There are 46 differences and 19 similarities between COOSA VALLEY NURSING FACILITY, KELLER LANDING CARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER

General
City
Sylacauga Tuscumbia
State attribute explanation
Al Al
Street
315 West Hickory Street 813 Keller Lane
Zip Code
35,150 35,674
Phone
2,562,495,604 2,563,831,535
Overall Star Rating
4
4
Health Inspections Star Rating
3
3
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
3
3
RN Only Star Rating
4
5
Number of Certified Beds
85
109
Total Number of Residents
69
73
Percent of Occupied Beds
81 %
67 %
Health Survey Date
7/8/2011 7/14/2011
Fire Survey Date
7/13/2011 7/20/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
Non Profit - Other For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
Yes No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
No Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Both Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No No
Special Focus Facility?
No No
Civil Money Penalty Count
1
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
1
75.2
# of deficiencies
2 2
Staff Information
Number of Residents
78
73
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.54
0.97
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.91
0.9
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
3.46
1.87
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05
0.01
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05
0.01
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Manylevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure There Is A Pest Control Program To Prevent/deal With Mice, Insects, Or Other Pests.survey Date: 06/24/2010date Of Correction: 07/26/2010
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.survey Date: 09/10/2010date Of Correction: 10/15/2010 Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 1deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.survey Date: 06/24/2010date Of Correction: 07/26/2010
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.survey Date: 09/10/2010date Of Correction: 10/15/2010
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
28.9 %
35.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1 %
2.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.4 %
29.4 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
9.4 / 10.4
6.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.5 %
20 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
9.9:1
1.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.4 %
3.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 %
7.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
38.6 %
29.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
86.8 %
23.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
86.4 %
20.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.9 %
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.1 %
1.50 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21.4 %
33.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.8 %
1.50 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6 %
27.5 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
9.7 %
6.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6 %
12 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
17.9 (64.2)
27.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
8.9 / 9.9
2 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.7 %
3.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2 %
8.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.9 %
1.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
40.7 %
39.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
84.3 %
16.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
86.2 %
18.2:1
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.3 %
3.1 %

saved