Back
 Add

Compare:

DEERFIELD CARE CENTER, LLC VS GOLDEN LIVINGCENTER-RIB LAKE

Overview:

There are 50 differences and 16 similarities between DEERFIELD CARE CENTER, LLC, GOLDEN LIVINGCENTER-RIB LAKE

General
City
New Richmond Rib Lake
State attribute explanation
Wi Wi
Street
505 W 8th St 650 Pearl St Po Box 308
Zip Code
54,017 54,470
Phone
7,152,466,851 7,154,275,291
Overall Star Rating
4
3
Health Inspections Star Rating
4
2
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
2
4
RN Only Star Rating
5
5
Number of Certified Beds
61
60
Total Number of Residents
29
37
Percent of Occupied Beds
48 %
62 %
Health Survey Date
6/15/2011 6/14/2012
Fire Survey Date
7/12/2011 6/22/2012
Sprinkler Status
Partially Sprinklered Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
Non Profit - Corporation For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Resident Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Yes No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No No
Special Focus Facility?
No No
Civil Money Penalty Count
3
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
3
75.2
# of deficiencies
4
3
Staff Information
Number of Residents
29
37
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.34
1.17
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.43
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.34
1.6
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.02
0.13
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.02
0.13
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 03/24/2010date Of Correction: 04/09/2010 Scope: Manylevel Of Harm: 1deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.survey Date: 04/05/2011date Of Correction: 05/05/2011
Deficiency #2
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 11/09/2010date Of Correction: 11/18/2010
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 07/01/2010date Of Correction: 05/18/2010
Deficiency #2
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 07/01/2010date Of Correction: 05/18/2010
Deficiency #3
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.survey Date: 07/01/2010date Of Correction: 05/18/2010
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Give Or Get Quality Lab Services/tests In A Timely Manner To Meet The Needs Of Residents.survey Date: 04/05/2011date Of Correction: 05/05/2011
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
28.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
11.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
8.6:1
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
20.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
73.8 %
95.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
67.4 %
91.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
12.5 %
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
25 %
26.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.5 %
20.5 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
12.8:1
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.9 %
5.5 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
44.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
6.6 %
9.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.4 %
4.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7.8 %
10.3:1
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
2.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.4 %
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
37.5 %
31 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
68.7 %
89.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
57.7 %
87.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
7.7 %
75.2 %

saved