Back
 Add

Compare:

DURHAM NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER VS KENANSVILLE HEALTH & REHABILITATION CENTER

Overview:

There are 38 differences and 24 similarities between DURHAM NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER, KENANSVILLE HEALTH & REHABILITATION CENTER

General
City
Durham Kenansville
State attribute explanation
Nc Nc
Street
411 S Lasalle Street 209 Beasley Street
Zip Code
27,705 28,349
Phone
9,193,835,521 9,102,961,561
Overall Star Rating
3
3
Health Inspections Star Rating
3
4
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
3
1
Quality Measures Star Rating
3
3
RN Only Star Rating
3
1
Number of Certified Beds
126
92
Total Number of Residents
101
79
Percent of Occupied Beds
80 %
86 %
Health Survey Date
3/8/2012 5/3/2012
Fire Survey Date
3/8/2012 5/30/2012
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation For Profit - Limited Liability Company
Located Within a Hospital?
No No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Both Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No Yes
Special Focus Facility?
No No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
75.2
Staff Information
Number of Residents
101
79
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.68
0.45
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.77
1.05
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.45
1.49
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06
0.07
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06
0.07
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20.4 %
18.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
15.2 %
16.9-24
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6 %
9.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6 %
4.5 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
77.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.6 %
7.9:1
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
14 %
9.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.9 %
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
29.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
68.2 %
76.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
68.2 %
65.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.6 / 3
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.9 %
1.50 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.7 %
17.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.8 %
0.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
16.6 %
18.6 (65.5)
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.5 %
12.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.9 %
4 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
72.2 %
50.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.7 %
5.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.2 %
5.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.9 %
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.20 %
2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
47.2 %
29.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
46.2 %
80.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
23.1 %
68.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
7.1 %
6.3 %

saved