Back
 Add

Compare:

EISENBERG VILLAGE VS INTERCOMMUNITY HEALTHCARE & REHABILITATION CENTER

Overview:

There are 53 differences and 17 similarities between EISENBERG VILLAGE, INTERCOMMUNITY HEALTHCARE & REHABILITATION CENTER

General
City
Reseda Norwalk
State attribute explanation
Ca Ca
Street
18855 Victory Bl 12627 Studebaker Road
Zip Code
91,335 90,650
Phone
8,187,743,000 5,628,684,767
Overall Star Rating
5
1
Health Inspections Star Rating
3
1
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
3
Quality Measures Star Rating
5
1
RN Only Star Rating
2
2
Number of Certified Beds
166
86
Total Number of Residents
165
75
Percent of Occupied Beds
99 %
87 %
Health Survey Date
5/24/2011 6/22/2011
Fire Survey Date
6/3/2011 6/21/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
Non Profit - Corporation For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Both Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Yes No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No No
Special Focus Facility?
No No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
75.2
# of deficiencies
7
Staff Information
Number of Residents
165
75
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.37
0.68
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.92
1.68
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.28
2.35
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.08
0.07
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.08
0.07
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 02/18/2011date Of Correction: 04/01/2011
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.survey Date: 06/22/2011date Of Correction: 07/23/2011
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.survey Date: 02/18/2011date Of Correction: 04/01/2011
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.survey Date: 02/18/2011date Of Correction: 04/01/2011
Deficiency #3
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 02/18/2011date Of Correction: 04/01/2011
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.survey Date: 02/18/2011date Of Correction: 04/01/2011
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.survey Date: 02/18/2011date Of Correction: 04/01/2011
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
28.1 %
17.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.50 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.3 %
34.8 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.9 %
9.4 / 10.4
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.4 %
2.8 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
61.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.5 %
8.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.8 %
9.9:1
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.5 %
2.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.6 %
7 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
23.8:1
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
100 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.5 %
75.2 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
29 %
14.9-28
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
0.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.4 %
21.6 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.4 %
11.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5 %
5.6:1
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
57.4 %
25.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.20 %
7.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.3 %
11.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.9 %
1.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.6 %
5.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
13.7 %
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.4 %
27.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
69.6 %
48.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
84.3 %
51.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 %

saved