Back
 Add

Compare:

ELLENBURG NURSING CENTER, INC VS PRINCE GEORGE HEALTHCARE CENTER

Overview:

There are 52 differences and 18 similarities between ELLENBURG NURSING CENTER, INC, PRINCE GEORGE HEALTHCARE CENTER

General
City
Anderson Georgetown
State attribute explanation
Sc Sc
Street
611 East Hampton Street 901 Maple Street
Zip Code
29,624 29,440
Phone
8,642,265,054 8,435,466,101
Overall Star Rating
4
3
Health Inspections Star Rating
3
2
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
3
2
RN Only Star Rating
3
3
Number of Certified Beds
181
148
Total Number of Residents
168
139
Percent of Occupied Beds
93 %
94 %
Health Survey Date
3/14/2012 5/5/2011
Fire Survey Date
3/13/2012 5/5/2011
Sprinkler Status
Partially Sprinklered Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
No Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Both Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No No
Special Focus Facility?
No No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
75.2
# of deficiencies
3
4
Staff Information
Number of Residents
168
132
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.46
0.68
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.04
1.02
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.50
1.7
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01
0.1
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01
0.1
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 05/23/2012date Of Correction: 06/23/2012
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 05/05/2011date Of Correction: 06/04/2011
Deficiency #3
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide A Safe, Clean, Comfortable And Homelike Environment.survey Date: 05/05/2011date Of Correction: 06/04/2011
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 05/18/2010date Of Correction: 06/02/2010
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.survey Date: 09/15/2009date Of Correction: 10/15/2009
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Give Each Resident A Notice Of Rights, Rules, Services And Charges. Tell Each Resident Who Can Get Medicaid Benefits About 1) Which Items And Services Medicaid Covers And Which The Resident Must Pay For.survey Date: 05/05/2011date Of Correction: 06/04/2011
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.survey Date: 09/15/2009date Of Correction: 10/15/2009
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.9 %
14.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.7 %
0.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
12.6:1
13.3 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.9 %
10.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.9 %
17.5 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
67.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.4 %
5.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.7 %
5.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3 %
6.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
15 %
6.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4 %
21.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
91.7 %
64.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
100 %
75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
1.50 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.8 %
1.8 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
28 %
15 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.1 %
0.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.1 %
10.7:1
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.1 %
12.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.9 %
12.3:1
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
66.2 %
54.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.5 %
5.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.5 %
7.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.4 %
5.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
11.9 %
6.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.4 %
4.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.8 %
27.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.3 %
68.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
98.9 %
66.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.9 %
1.9 %

saved