Back
 Add

Compare:

GLEN HILL REHABILITATION & NURSING CENTER VS MEADOWBROOK OF GRANBY

Overview:

There are 47 differences and 23 similarities between GLEN HILL REHABILITATION & NURSING CENTER, MEADOWBROOK OF GRANBY

General
City
Danbury Granby
State attribute explanation
Ct Ct
Street
1 Glen Hill Rd 350 Salmon Brook Street
Zip Code
6,810 6,035
Phone
2,037,442,840 8,606,539,888
Overall Star Rating
5
5
Health Inspections Star Rating
5
3
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
4
5
RN Only Star Rating
5
4
Number of Certified Beds
100
90
Total Number of Residents
99
84
Percent of Occupied Beds
99 %
93 %
Health Survey Date
11/18/2011 2/2/2012
Fire Survey Date
11/18/2011 1/31/2012
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes No
Resident and Family Councils
Both Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Yes No
Quality Indicator Survey?
Yes Yes
Special Focus Facility?
No No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
75.2
# of deficiencies
7
Staff Information
Number of Residents
99
84
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.59
0.73
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.77
0.72
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
2.37
1.46
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.29
0.12
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.29
0.12
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 09/01/2011date Of Correction: 10/14/2011
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 09/01/2011date Of Correction: 10/14/2011
Deficiency #2
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 09/01/2011date Of Correction: 10/14/2011
Deficiency #3
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 02/11/2010date Of Correction: 03/25/2010
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.survey Date: 09/01/2011date Of Correction: 10/14/2011
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Manylevel Of Harm: 1deficiency: Operate And Provide Services According To Federal, State, And Local Laws And Professional Standards.survey Date: 09/01/2011date Of Correction: 10/14/2011
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.survey Date: 06/17/2009date Of Correction: 07/29/2009
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
22.4:1
15.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.2 %
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.9 %
5.8 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.1 %
10 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11.3 %
5.3 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
18.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.3 %
1.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.8 %
1.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.3 %
3.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.6 %
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
24.1 %
26.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.1 %
100 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
95.6 %
100 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
4 %
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.1 %
75.2 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20.6 %
21.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1 %
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.7 %
7.7 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.5 %
7.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.7 %
6.1 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
45.8 %
21.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.1 %
1.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.1 %
2.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.5 %
4.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.5 %
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2 %
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
27.9 %
20.7 (69.3)
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
88.6 %
98.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
97.6 %
100 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
22.8 %
8.5 %

saved