Back
 Add

Compare:

GOLDEN LIVINGCENTER - EASON BOULEVARD VS TUPELO NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER

Overview:

There are 47 differences and 28 similarities between GOLDEN LIVINGCENTER - EASON BOULEVARD, TUPELO NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER

General
City
Tupelo Tupelo
State attribute explanation
Ms Ms
Street
2273 South Eason Boulevard 1901 Briar Ridge Road
Zip Code
38,804 38,804
Phone
6,628,422,461 6,628,440,675
Overall Star Rating
4
3
Health Inspections Star Rating
3
4
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
3
1
Quality Measures Star Rating
5
4
RN Only Star Rating
4
1
Number of Certified Beds
120
120
Total Number of Residents
112
117
Percent of Occupied Beds
93 %
98 %
Health Survey Date
4/22/2011 5/20/2011
Fire Survey Date
4/28/2011 5/19/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Limited Liability Company For Profit - Partnership
Located Within a Hospital?
No No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes No
Resident and Family Councils
Both Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No No
Special Focus Facility?
No No
Civil Money Penalty Count
1
1
Total Enforcement Actions Count
1
1
# of deficiencies
11
5
Staff Information
Number of Residents
110
117
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.8
0.29
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.57
1.03
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.37
1.33
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.08
0.05
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.08
0.05
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.survey Date: 07/21/2010date Of Correction: 09/07/2010 Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 03/04/2010date Of Correction: 03/04/2010
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Put Firmly Secured Handrails On Each Side Of Hallways.survey Date: 02/09/2010date Of Correction: 03/19/2010
Deficiency #3
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide A Safe, Clean, Comfortable And Homelike Environment.survey Date: 02/09/2010date Of Correction: 03/19/2010
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.survey Date: 03/04/2010date Of Correction: 03/04/2010
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep Each Resident's Personal And Medical Records Private And Confidential.survey Date: 07/21/2010date Of Correction: 08/10/2010 Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.survey Date: 06/04/2009date Of Correction: 07/10/2009
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.survey Date: 11/23/2009date Of Correction: 12/31/2009
Deficiency #3
Scope: Manylevel Of Harm: 1deficiency: Allow Residents To Easily View The Results Of The Nursing Home's Most Recent Survey.survey Date: 06/08/2009date Of Correction: 07/15/2009
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 07/21/2010date Of Correction: 08/10/2010 Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 11/25/2009date Of Correction: 12/29/2009
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 11/23/2009date Of Correction: 12/31/2009
Deficiency #3
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 06/08/2009date Of Correction: 07/15/2009
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.survey Date: 11/23/2009date Of Correction: 12/31/2009
Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist.survey Date: 06/08/2009date Of Correction: 07/15/2009 Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Maintain Drug Records And Properly Mark/label Drugs And Other Similar Products According To Accepted Professional Standards.survey Date: 11/25/2009date Of Correction: 12/29/2009
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
24.5 %
21.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.5 %
6.8 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.4 %
1.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.1 %
9.8 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
73.9 %
72.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.20 %
2.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.2 %
2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.6 %
3.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
15.1 %
35.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
77 %
65.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
82 %
80.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
7.5 %
2.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1 %
0.9 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
24.3 %
17.9 (64.2)
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
13.5 %
11.4 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.7 %
1.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.7 %
8.8 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
73.5 %
73.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.8 %
1.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.9 %
4.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
15 %
2.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
4.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.7 %
1.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
13.1:1
43.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
50.8 %
54.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
61.3 %
85.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
12.9 (55.2)
11 %

saved