Back
 Add

Compare:

GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY - POSTVILLE VS GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY - GEORGE

Overview:

There are 40 differences and 26 similarities between GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY - POSTVILLE, GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY - GEORGE

General
City
Postville George
State attribute explanation
Ia Ia
Street
400 Hardin Drive 324 First Avenue North
Zip Code
52,162 51,237
Phone
5,638,647,425 7,124,753,391
Overall Star Rating
4
4
Health Inspections Star Rating
4
3
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
3
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
3
4
RN Only Star Rating
4
4
Number of Certified Beds
68
45
Total Number of Residents
41
36
Percent of Occupied Beds
60 %
80 %
Health Survey Date
7/25/2011 5/24/2012
Fire Survey Date
7/25/2011 5/30/2012
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
Non Profit - Corporation Non Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Resident Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No No
Special Focus Facility?
No No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
75.2
# of deficiencies
6
3
Staff Information
Number of Residents
41
36
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.76
0.67
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.37
0.51
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.14
1.17
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
75.2
0.06
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 05/24/2012date Of Correction: 06/08/2012
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 07/08/2010date Of Correction: 07/09/2010
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident.survey Date: 07/19/2010date Of Correction: 08/13/2010
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep Each Resident's Personal And Medical Records Private And Confidential.survey Date: 07/19/2010date Of Correction: 08/13/2010
Deficiency #3
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.survey Date: 06/26/2009date Of Correction: 07/26/2009
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being.survey Date: 07/19/2010date Of Correction: 08/13/2010 Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 03/19/2010date Of Correction: 04/19/2010
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.survey Date: 07/19/2010date Of Correction: 08/13/2010
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That Nurse Aides Show They Have The Skills And Techniques To Be Able To Care For Residents' Needs.survey Date: 07/19/2010date Of Correction: 08/13/2010
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
19.5-24
29.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
23.6 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
75.2 %
5.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
6 %
6.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.5 %
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
14.6 %
5.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.4 %
5.4 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20.7 (69.3)
30.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5 %
6.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
19.6 %
20.5 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.9 %
1.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.7 %
5.8 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
44.9 %
46.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.4 %
6.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.8 %
2.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
14.9-28
5.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.6 / 3
2.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
37.5 %
13.6-28
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
72.2 %
95 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
96 %
96.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 %
75.2 %

saved