Back
 Add

Compare:

GREENWOOD VILLAGE SOUTH VS SUGAR CREEK REHABILITATION AND CONVALESCENT CENTER

Overview:

There are 51 differences and 23 similarities between GREENWOOD VILLAGE SOUTH, SUGAR CREEK REHABILITATION AND CONVALESCENT CENTER

General
City
Greenwood Greenfield
State attribute explanation
In In
Street
295 Village Lane 5430 W Us 40
Zip Code
46,143 46,140
Phone
3,178,594,444 3,178,943,301
Overall Star Rating
2
2
Health Inspections Star Rating
1
1
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
2
4
RN Only Star Rating
3
4
Number of Certified Beds
137
60
Total Number of Residents
101
47
Percent of Occupied Beds
74 %
78 %
Health Survey Date
12/15/2011 5/12/2011
Fire Survey Date
1/10/2012 6/14/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
Non Profit - Corporation For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
No No
Resident and Family Councils
Resident Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Yes No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No No
Special Focus Facility?
No No
Civil Money Penalty Count
5
2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
5
2
# of deficiencies
10
6
Staff Information
Number of Residents
101
48
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.62
0.58
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.64
1.05
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
2.26
1.63
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.13
0.01
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.13
0.01
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 11/03/2011date Of Correction: 01/24/2012 Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 06/15/2011date Of Correction: 07/12/2011
Deficiency #2
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 05/13/2010date Of Correction: 04/05/2010
Deficiency #3
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 12/16/2009date Of Correction: 01/11/2010
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep Each Resident Free From Physical Restraints, Unless Needed For Medical Treatment.survey Date: 11/03/2011date Of Correction: 12/15/2011 Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 06/15/2011date Of Correction: 08/03/2011
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 06/15/2011date Of Correction: 08/03/2011
Deficiency #3
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.survey Date: 06/15/2011date Of Correction: 07/12/2011
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.survey Date: 11/03/2011date Of Correction: 12/15/2011 Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.survey Date: 03/07/2012date Of Correction: 03/14/2012
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 11/03/2011date Of Correction: 01/24/2012 Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 06/15/2011date Of Correction: 07/12/2011
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 08/18/2011date Of Correction: 09/17/2011
Deficiency #3
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 08/18/2011date Of Correction: 09/17/2011
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.survey Date: 11/22/2010date Of Correction: 12/22/2010
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.survey Date: 12/16/2009date Of Correction: 01/11/2010
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.3 %
57.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.7 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10.7:1
25.6 (78.1)
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.1 %
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
16.7 %
9.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
25.3 %
2.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
4.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
19.1:1
14.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
93.1 %
100 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
93.1 %
100 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 %
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.6 %
75.2 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
26.3 (79.3)
62.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.4 %
4.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9.4 / 10.4
5.4 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.2 %
15.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10.6 %
19.7 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
34.7 %
33.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1 %
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
17.7 %
5.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
24.6 %
2.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.50 %
7.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.4 %
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
17.4 %
18.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
88.1 %
95.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
93.1 %
13.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
27.3 %
6.5 %

saved