Back
 Add

Compare:

HOOVERWOOD VS MUNSTER MED-INN

Overview:

There are 47 differences and 24 similarities between HOOVERWOOD, MUNSTER MED-INN

General
City
Indianapolis Munster
State attribute explanation
In In
Street
7001 Hoover Rd 7935 Calumet Ave
Zip Code
46,260 46,321
Phone
3,172,512,261 2,198,368,300
Overall Star Rating
4
2
Health Inspections Star Rating
4
1
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
3
3
RN Only Star Rating
3
3
Number of Certified Beds
188
225
Total Number of Residents
169
195
Percent of Occupied Beds
90 %
87 %
Health Survey Date
5/8/2012 11/7/2011
Fire Survey Date
5/18/2012 12/1/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
Non Profit - Corporation For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
No No
Resident and Family Councils
Resident Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No No
Quality Indicator Survey?
Yes Yes
Special Focus Facility?
No No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
1
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
1
# of deficiencies
1
7
Staff Information
Number of Residents
169
195
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.59
0.57
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.81
1.01
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.4
1.57
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04
0.1
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04
0.1
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 08/24/2011date Of Correction: 08/25/2011
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 06/01/2011date Of Correction: 07/01/2011
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 06/01/2011date Of Correction: 07/01/2011
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 06/01/2011date Of Correction: 07/01/2011
Deficiency #3
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.survey Date: 06/01/2011date Of Correction: 07/01/2011
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Has The Right To Have A Choice Over Activities, Their Schedules And Health Care According To His Or Her Interests, Assessment, And Plan Of Care.survey Date: 08/24/2011date Of Correction: 08/25/2011
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.survey Date: 08/24/2011date Of Correction: 08/25/2011
Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way.survey Date: 02/19/2010date Of Correction: 03/19/2010
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
24 %
25.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.3 %
5.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
21.9 %
9.8 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6 %
15.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.7 %
6.4 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
78.8 %
43.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 %
4.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.9 %
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.7 %
1.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
0.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
20.4 %
8.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
87.7 %
87.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
86.4 %
87.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.9 %
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.5 %
0.6 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.3 %
24.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4 %
6.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
23.9 %
11.6:1
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.5 %
15.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.8 %
5.1 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
73 %
37.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.2 %
4.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.7 %
0.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.4 %
2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.4 %
0.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5 %
1.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
21.3 %
8.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
89.4 %
86.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
87.3 %
75.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
20.6 %
35.4 %

saved