Back
 Add

Compare:

J F HAWKINS NURSING HOME VS FOUNTAIN INN CONVALESCENT CENTER

Overview:

There are 44 differences and 25 similarities between J F HAWKINS NURSING HOME, FOUNTAIN INN CONVALESCENT CENTER

General
City
Newberry Fountain Inn
State attribute explanation
Sc Sc
Street
1330 Kinard Street 501 Gulliver St
Zip Code
29,108 29,644
Phone
8,032,762,601 8,648,622,554
Overall Star Rating
2
2
Health Inspections Star Rating
1
2
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
4
1
RN Only Star Rating
3
4
Number of Certified Beds
118
60
Total Number of Residents
106
56
Percent of Occupied Beds
90 %
93 %
Health Survey Date
5/22/2012 4/4/2012
Fire Survey Date
5/22/2012 4/5/2012
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Resident Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Yes No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No No
Special Focus Facility?
No No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
75.2
# of deficiencies
5
2
Staff Information
Number of Residents
106
56
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.57
0.74
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.94
1.05
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.51
1.8
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.13
0.1
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.13
0.1
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 11/18/2010date Of Correction: 12/02/2010
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 07/19/2010date Of Correction: 08/08/2010
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.survey Date: 11/18/2010date Of Correction: 12/10/2010 Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.survey Date: 12/06/2011date Of Correction: 01/05/2012
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 11/18/2010date Of Correction: 12/10/2010
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.survey Date: 12/06/2011date Of Correction: 01/05/2012
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.survey Date: 11/18/2010date Of Correction: 12/10/2010
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.6 %
20.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.2 %
7.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.3 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.7 %
8.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10.9 %
11.6:1
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
58.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.20 %
3.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
13 %
18.6 (65.5)
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 %
30.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
2.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
88.1 %
90.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
93.2 %
83.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
12.8:1
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 %
9.1 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
26.3 (79.3)
20 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.8 %
4.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.3 %
6.9 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.1 %
6.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
15.1 %
12.9 (55.2)
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
57.8 %
50 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.7 %
2.6 / 3
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
11.8:1
15.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 %
17.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1 %
2.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.6 %
7.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
15 %
33.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
85.5 %
94.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
92 %
87.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
10.2 %
4.5 %

saved