Back
 Add

Compare:

KENDAL AT LEXINGTON VS YORK CONVALESCENT CENTER

Overview:

There are 46 differences and 21 similarities between KENDAL AT LEXINGTON, YORK CONVALESCENT CENTER

General
City
Lexington Yorktown
State attribute explanation
Va Va
Street
170 Kendal Drive 113 Battle Road
Zip Code
24,450 23,692
Phone
5,404,631,910 7,578,981,491
Overall Star Rating
2
3
Health Inspections Star Rating
1
3
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
3
Quality Measures Star Rating
4
4
RN Only Star Rating
2
3
Number of Certified Beds
60
60
Total Number of Residents
57
56
Percent of Occupied Beds
95 %
93 %
Health Survey Date
3/19/2012 8/19/2011
Fire Survey Date
3/26/2012 8/22/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
No Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Both Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Yes No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No No
Special Focus Facility?
No No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
75.2
# of deficiencies
5
Staff Information
Number of Residents
57
56
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.48
0.68
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.22
0.91
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.7
1.58
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.2
0.03
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.2
0.03
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident.survey Date: 07/02/2009date Of Correction: Not Available
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care For Each Resident In A Way That Keeps Or Builds The Resident's Quality Of Life.survey Date: 07/02/2009date Of Correction: Not Available
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being.survey Date: 07/02/2009date Of Correction: Not Available
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.survey Date: 07/02/2009date Of Correction: Not Available
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.survey Date: 07/02/2009date Of Correction: Not Available
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
36 %
13.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.50 %
1.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.1 %
17.8:1
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
14.3 %
6.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10.2 %
18.2:1
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.8 %
1.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
12.2 %
10.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
10 %
40 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
12.2 %
29.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
41.5 %
90.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
34 %
93.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 %
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4 %
1.8 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
33.6 %
13 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2 %
1.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.9 %
12.7 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
10.1:1
8.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.9 / 9.9
15.6 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
49.3 %
63.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.1 %
1.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.1 / 8.8
9.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7.2 %
21.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.1 %
2.6 / 3
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10.8 %
12 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
21.1 %
81.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
17.6 %
95.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
18.9 %
23.4 %

saved