Back
 Add

Compare:

MAPLES BENZIE CO MEDICAL CARE VS MARLETTE COMM HOSP LTCU

Overview:

There are 50 differences and 19 similarities between MAPLES BENZIE CO MEDICAL CARE, MARLETTE COMM HOSP LTCU

General
City
Frankfort Marlette
State attribute explanation
Mi Mi
Street
210 Maple St 2,770
Zip Code
49,635 48,453
Phone
2,313,529,674 9,896,354,000
Overall Star Rating
5
4
Health Inspections Star Rating
5
4
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
5
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
2
3
RN Only Star Rating
5
4
Number of Certified Beds
62
39
Total Number of Residents
57
39
Percent of Occupied Beds
92 %
100 %
Health Survey Date
5/19/2011 1/27/2012
Fire Survey Date
5/19/2011 1/27/2012
Sprinkler Status
Partially Sprinklered Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
Government - County Non Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No Yes
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
No No
Resident and Family Councils
Resident Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No No
Special Focus Facility?
No No
Civil Money Penalty Count
1
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
1
1
# of deficiencies
7
Staff Information
Number of Residents
57
39
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.04
0.82
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.48
0.51
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.53
1.33
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.1
75.2
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.1
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 03/07/2012date Of Correction: 04/09/2012
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 05/02/2012date Of Correction: 06/19/2012
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 05/02/2012date Of Correction: 06/19/2012
Deficiency #3
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 06/22/2011date Of Correction: 06/27/2011
Deficiency #4
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 06/22/2011date Of Correction: 06/27/2011
Deficiency #5
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.survey Date: 06/22/2011date Of Correction: 06/27/2011
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.survey Date: 03/07/2012date Of Correction: 04/09/2012
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
11.8:1
7.9:1
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
27.8 (82.0)
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6 %
5.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
7.5 %
8.1 / 8.8
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4 %
2.6 / 3
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.1 %
16.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3.8 %
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
29.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
91.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
83.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 %
1
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.9 %
5.3 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
10.5 %
6.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.9 %
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
21.7 %
19.3 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.5 %
4.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.7 %
7.1 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
57.6 %
50 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
8.5 %
6.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9.2 %
0.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.1 %
18.2:1
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
4.3 %
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.8 %
4.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
39 %
43.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
86.7 %
28 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
88.7 %
85.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
10.3:1
75.2 %

saved