Back
 Add

Compare:

NEW HOPE HEALTH AND REHABILITATION, LLC VS FAYETTEVILLE CITY HOSPITAL AND GERIATRIC CENTER

Overview:

There are 48 differences and 28 similarities between NEW HOPE HEALTH AND REHABILITATION, LLC, FAYETTEVILLE CITY HOSPITAL AND GERIATRIC CENTER

General
City
Rogers Fayetteville
State attribute explanation
Ar Ar
Street
1149 West New Hope Road 221 South School Street
Zip Code
72,758 72,701
Phone
4,796,366,290 4,794,425,100
Overall Star Rating
5
3
Health Inspections Star Rating
3
3
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
3
Quality Measures Star Rating
5
4
RN Only Star Rating
2
1
Number of Certified Beds
140
123
Total Number of Residents
73
80
Percent of Occupied Beds
52 %
65 %
Health Survey Date
3/2/2012 11/18/2011
Fire Survey Date
2/29/2012 11/14/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered Partially Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation Non Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
No No
Resident and Family Councils
Resident Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No No
Special Focus Facility?
No No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
75.2
# of deficiencies
6 8
Staff Information
Number of Residents
73
80
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.38
0.2
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.09
1.29
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.47
1.49
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.15
0.01
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.15
0.01
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.survey Date: 05/31/2012date Of Correction: 06/30/2012
Deficiency #2
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.survey Date: 10/14/2010date Of Correction: 11/13/2010
Deficiency #3
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 10/14/2010date Of Correction: 11/13/2010
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 12/14/2011date Of Correction: 01/13/2012
Deficiency #2
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 12/14/2011date Of Correction: 01/13/2012
Deficiency #3
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep Each Resident Free From Physical Restraints, Unless Needed For Medical Treatment.survey Date: 01/14/2010date Of Correction: 02/13/2010
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident.survey Date: 04/28/2010date Of Correction: 05/17/2010
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.survey Date: 09/03/2009date Of Correction: 10/02/2009
Deficiency #3
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.survey Date: 09/03/2009date Of Correction: 10/02/2009
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 05/11/2012date Of Correction: Not Available
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 04/28/2010date Of Correction: 05/17/2010
Deficiency #3
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.survey Date: 09/03/2009date Of Correction: 10/02/2009
Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.survey Date: 10/14/2010date Of Correction: 11/13/2010
Deficiency #2
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep The Rate Of Medication Errors (wrong Drug, Wrong Dose, Wrong Time) To Less Than 5%.survey Date: 10/14/2010date Of Correction: 11/13/2010
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23 %
23.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
3.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
12.8:1
8.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.5 %
4.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 %
2.20 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
75.2 %
5.6:1
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
17.9 (64.2)
5.6:1
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.3 %
1.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
14.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.4 %
93.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
100 %
93.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 %
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.7 %
2.8 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
25.1 %
22.1 (71.8)
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
0.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.3 %
4.8 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.8 %
9.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.1 %
6.2 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
48.6 %
46.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.50 %
3.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
75.2 %
8.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
9 %
7.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.9 %
0.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.7 %
0.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.6:1
20.2 (68.4)
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.2 %
93.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
94.6 %
98.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
16 %
75.2 %

saved