Back
 Add

Compare:

NEW MARK CARE CENTER VS LIFE CARE CENTER OF SULLIVAN

Overview:

There are 38 differences and 29 similarities between NEW MARK CARE CENTER, LIFE CARE CENTER OF SULLIVAN

General
City
Kansas City Sullivan
State attribute explanation
Mo Mo
Street
11221 North Nashua Drive 875 Dunsford Drive
Zip Code
64,155 63,080
Phone
8,167,344,433 5,734,683,128
Overall Star Rating
4
4
Health Inspections Star Rating
4
4
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
3
Quality Measures Star Rating
2
2
RN Only Star Rating
3
3
Number of Certified Beds
199
120
Total Number of Residents
175
63
Percent of Occupied Beds
88 %
53 %
Health Survey Date
9/22/2011 11/10/2011
Fire Survey Date
9/22/2011 11/10/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Resident Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No No
Special Focus Facility?
No No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
75.2
# of deficiencies
4
1
Staff Information
Number of Residents
175
63
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.66
0.61
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.86
0.92
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.51
1.52
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.09
0.18
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.09
0.18
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep All Essential Equipment Working Safely.survey Date: 03/11/2010date Of Correction: 04/07/2010
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.survey Date: 09/15/2009date Of Correction: 10/16/2009
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 06/11/2009date Of Correction: 07/29/2009
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 06/11/2009date Of Correction: 07/29/2009 Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.survey Date: 08/04/2011date Of Correction: 09/09/2011
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
18.1:1
29.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.7 %
1.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
24.3 %
18.6 (65.5)
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
9.6 %
9.4 / 10.4
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.7 %
14 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
24.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.1 %
4.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.4 %
10 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
12.2 %
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.3 %
4 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
16.3:1
30.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
81.9 %
94.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
91.9 %
98.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.8 %
4 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.8:1
31.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.7 %
0.5 - 2.0
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
24.8 %
13.8 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.7 %
7.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.2 %
15.2 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
32.5 %
13.9 / 15.3
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.5 %
6.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.8 %
6.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
9.5 %
1.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.3 %
3.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.4 %
5 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
18.7 %
42.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
78.2 %
95.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
88.1 %
99.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.5 - 2.0
10.2 %

saved