Back
 Add

Compare:

OMEGA HEALTH & REHAB OF GREENVILLE, LLC VS FLORENCE REHAB & NURSING CENTER, LLC

Overview:

There are 43 differences and 23 similarities between OMEGA HEALTH & REHAB OF GREENVILLE, LLC, FLORENCE REHAB & NURSING CENTER, LLC

General
City
Greenville Florence
State attribute explanation
Sc Sc
Street
809 Laurens Road 133 West Clarke Road
Zip Code
29,607 29,501
Phone
8,642,328,196 8,436,694,374
Overall Star Rating
3
1
Health Inspections Star Rating
3
2
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
1
Quality Measures Star Rating
1
3
RN Only Star Rating
1
Number of Certified Beds
79
88
Total Number of Residents
72
78
Percent of Occupied Beds
91 %
89 %
Health Survey Date
5/24/2011 2/14/2012
Fire Survey Date
5/25/2011 2/16/2012
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Limited Liability Company For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Both Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No No
Special Focus Facility?
No No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
75.2
# of deficiencies
3
1
Staff Information
Number of Residents
75
78
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.72
0.4
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.81
1.03
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.53
1.44
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01
0.02
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01
0.02
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 01/30/2012date Of Correction: 02/17/2012
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 05/03/2012date Of Correction: 05/25/2012
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.survey Date: 05/03/2012date Of Correction: 05/25/2012
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 05/03/2012date Of Correction: 05/25/2012
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
27.4 %
24.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.4 %
10.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
13.8 %
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.7 %
13.6-28
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
75.2 %
21.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.3 %
1.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
12.1:1
5.6:1
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.4 %
2.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.50 %
11.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
17.9 (64.2)
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
73 %
55.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
76.9 %
50 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.50 %
9.7 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.4 %
23.7 (74.7)
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
6.2 %
5.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10.8 %
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.7 %
10.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.50 %
21.7 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
48.2 %
51.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.3 %
1.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
10.5 %
5.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.4 %
3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.4 %
14.9-28
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.8 %
6 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
23.7 (74.7)
7.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
70 %
64.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
76 %
8.9 / 9.9
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
23.4 %
6 %

saved